applaud, but why isn't substantive due process just another way for justices to hide their policymaking under the guise further constitution? >> welcome of the justices have interpreted the due process clause of the 14th amendment to include a substantive provision that the right to due process, they have interpreted that to mean not just procedural right relative to government action, but also the protection of certain personal rights related to intimacy and autonomy, and it includes things like the right to rear one's children. i believe the right to travel, the right to marriage,