on a nuance question, the vulnerable part of the population and whether it might warrant a benefit for them, the 18 panelists voted for it. saying essentially that the focus would have to be on those that are deemed vulnerable in the population again. as i mentioned those with certain immunity risks or elderly, anyone that has a high risk of severe covid-19. even if they had been treated already. now, it's probably adding to your confusion over this. this is sort of the split read, the fda effectively saying that, you know, if you've been vaccinated, we think a third shot is a good idea, but only if you are a vulnerable part of the population, a fraction of that population. as we suspected and doctors told us, it was near to though that need it. conditions as such that they're
Related Keywords
Population , Part , Nuance Question , Panelists , Benefit , Focus , 18 , Elderly , Risk , Immunity Risks , Covid , Anyone , 19 , Fda , Shot , Idea , Confusion , Sort , Split , Doctors , Us , Fraction , Conditions ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.