we have. do you think it's a good decision? do you think it is informed by the research we have as opposed to a desire to reduce disruption?ar >> well, look. they are always playing the odds and always i think open to criticism for being too slow orh too fast. what they are doing here is g saying, if you are after five days no longer symptomatic, and by the way, if you can find one, strongly recommend taking an antigen test, stay at home testw if you are negative very low likelihood that you're going tov be contagious. so telling 90% of people to stay home for the next five days when they're not contagious has a real cost to it. but these are never absolutes. these recommendations are going to get criticism from both sides because you're going to have g some people that are still contagious and day six or day seven who are asymptomatic. i think the number will be a