other parts of the facebook document showed, they provide an opportunity for real comradery and they're very much called to action, called to retweet -- sometimes that call to take action extends to violence. one of the things the public doesn't really understand -- this is because algorithmic curation is so complex, is understanding why they see what they see, understanding that certain content is intended to rage bait and perhaps media literacy efforts, which really right now focus on young kids in college, people on tiktok, i would argue that's not the generation that needs it, actually. the ability to understand that the information that you see is actually designed to rile you up a lot of time and recognize that prompt, to recognize that when you share out of that outrage, you are, in fact, begetting that conspiracy theory or that propaganda. i think that at this point what we need is an education in what that dynamic looks like and how we can recognize our own emotional reactions to the content that we see in order to try to, you know, while regulators are doing their work and data scientists inside facebook are fighting the good fight to improve curation, what can we do to change the environment just a little bit?