they passed to protect the whistle-blower and echoing the president who has argued for to unmask or expose the whistle-blower. when you hear advocacy for that for exposing the whistle-blower, you are hearing advocacy for a new and separate crime. whether the security rationales can be taken out in a way where this would be a classified setting and they wouldn't be exposed in any way, that's certainly possible. and at some point in the process it could be an interesting thing to do. but against a backdrop where some of the people who are subject to the investigation have been calling to expose the whistle-blower, i think that vote looks more like of a piece of that intimidation and not necessarily a fact-finding request by the minority. >> ari thanks, garrett haake is in the hallway having been in the room for much of today. garrett, the coverage has been interesting. i guess social media coverage has been focused on mr. kent as a bow tie and nalgene bottle