Transcripts For SFGTV2 20111012 : vimarsana.com

composition will be changed from four elected people and three appointees to be for appointees and if reelected. four appointees and three elected. and elected by the system. then you have five people. at this point, it has worked extremely well. most decisions are unanimous. it will be an artificially induced split that will be a change in the composition. that is the major reaction. what we spoke with the executive director of the labor council the claim that the seventh appointee would come from the comptroller s office. how do you not believe that that provides protection for your membership? where were the appointee comes from as a little bit different from being able to elect the person. the comptroller is himself an appointee of the mayor. so you have an appointee of the appointee, and a 60 day limit before they have to decide on who the person will be. otherwise, the appointee becomes the person automatically. it seems little unfair. the of us who are retirees were ever involved in any of these discussions. we hope that that was informative. please visit the web site at the league of women voters. and remember, early voting is available at city hall monday through friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.. the biggest issue in america today? segregation still exists. racism. the repression and oppression of women the educational system stem cell research homeless people cloning government health care taxation announcer: so, is there anything you re doing to help make a change? i m not really doin anything. ummmm [sighs] got me on that one. i am ellis said griffin, a columnist the rights of the san francisco city politics. i am also a member of the league of women voters. i am here to have a discussion of proposition d on november s ballot. proposition d is a charter amendment that would change the way that the city, current and future employees share in funding. it will also require an elected officials to pay the same contribution rates as a city employees. it would increase retirement contribution rates for most current city employees based on city cost. for future city employees, and prohibit the city from paying any employee contributions. proposition c and d, if voters approve of measures, only the one with the most votes will become law. i am here with the treasurer of the campaign and a former member why should voters vote for proposition d? it had its origin a year ago. the origin of proposition b started with a grand jury investigation of the retirement system in san francisco. i was a member and during those years, i worked with other members of the grand jury. we issued reports in 2010 and 2009 with the expectation that public officials to propose legislation. there is only one public official that approached us and was willing to work on crafting legislation. and that was a public defender. 115,000 voted yes last year. a very strong constituency. we hope they will be back. the difference between proposition c and d is basically cost savings. d will save over $400 million over the next 10 years. prop d was crafted with exempting lowest paid city workers from any increase in contribution, at the rates that are part of proposition d are progressive. proposition d is also a disruptive force in city politics. there is a very strong special- interest group that has fought against any pension reform in san francisco. that is later. we hope that they will look at it in a positive way. opponents argue that it was done not in a collaborative lateway. that it was done unilaterally. how do you address concerns? the origin of proposition b and d was a civil grand jury investigation, a group of 19 residents of san francisco, who had a very diversified group of people representing unions, representing retired people, representing middle-class and minority groups. the fact that this is a criticism is not valid and the collaboration of the opposition talked about who was a collaboration for special interest groups. opponents have alleged that even if it is passed, it will be held up in court and perhaps not even implemented. how do you respond to concerns about proposition d? i read about prop c, 8225 page document that was totally incomprehensible to me. i am familiar with legal documents. the d measure is 25 pages, simple to understand. i fully expec tboth me expect both measures will be challenging. especially those that oppose proposition c, and there are many, it will be brought forward. up next, we will talk to an opponent of proposition d. i am here with the executive director of the san francisco labor council and an opponent of proposition d. why should voters voted against proposition d? i was telling people why they should vote yes on measure c. d is the opposite way of the way people should be doing business. this is a scott walker wisconsin initiative. it was done with no input from the workers. it was financed by a key party republicans that have financed the this and got $5 a signature to put this on the ballot. none of the city workers were involved, it was unilaterally put on. it is the wisconsin way of doing things. it does not accomplish what is supposed to do. it is legally challengeable. i am asking everyone to vote because there will be legal challenges with what it purports to do. proponents say it will save $400 million more than a proposition c. why should they not go with a measure that is going to save more money? the process was done without any input on those numbers. they are way over bloated in terms of the numbers, it probably does a little bit more money than what we did, but it was done by the same type of republicans that are attacking public workers and wisconsin, san jose, other areas around the country. it will not save that type of money. we worked with the city comptroller, we talked to workers, we had major analysis. everybody agrees, this is the way that the city will run better, it will save money and jobs. yes on c commonality. no on d. the increments they used to determine a contribution are smaller is a bogus argument. people claymore during bad times and not so much in good times. it is sensitive to workers that make police and fire and up paying more. it was done with a thorough analysis of different employee organizations in the city. thank you so much, mr. paulson. for information about this and other ballot measures, go to the san francisco league of women voters website at sfvotes.com. early voting is available at city hall monday through friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. i m melissa griffin, i write about city politics and a member of the league of women voters. i am here to discuss a proposition g, voters will be faced with on november s valid. ballot. proposition g would increase the sales tax rate by 0.5% for a total tax rate of 9%. this would only happen if the state does not increase the sales tax by either 1% before november 30, 2011 or 0.75% before january 1, 2015. the city would pass a tax increase to pay for public safety programs and the other half for programs for children and seniors. the city will start collecting this additional sales tax on april 1, 2012. it would apply for 10 years. prior to july 1, san francisco had the sales tax rate of 9.5%. the city decreased by 1% when it allowed to expire. san francisco only gets a fraction of this 8.5% sales tax. 7.25% goes to this day, the city receiving about 1%. goes to the state, the city receiving about 1%. i m here with thank you for being here. please tell us why you are in favor of proposition g. i believe the low income children, seniors, firefighters, and police officers are worth half a cent. it will restore funding that was cut from these programs. proposition g restore $30 million so the children will have a better start in life and a better chance of succeeding in high school and college. san francisco has one of the highest sales tax rates. are you concerned that the passage will affect our tourism or adversely affect the economics? i am not concerned with that at all. tourism accounts for 40% of the revenue. it will still be lower than the sales tax prior to july 1 of this year. my understanding is that it will be eliminated if the state raise the sales tax within the next year. in light of that, palace of the city is able to plan, budget, and expect those revenues if it passes. that s a good question. it is about local control. they can decide where their tax dollars go, in light of lack of leadership of politicians in sacramento, but we are not counting on that type of leadership occurring any time soon. it would be helpful that the politicians will listen to the need of san franciscans and act accordingly when they enacted the next sales tax. up next, we will be talking with an opponent. i m here with howard, former chairman of the san francisco republican party. he is an opponent of proposition g. thank you for being here. why should voters vote against proposition g? in this age of high unemployment and high high unemployment of high unemployment, a regressive sales tax will hurt everyone. just to give you an idea, in 2000, the budget was $4.2 billion. in 2010, the 2011 budget is 6.8 $3 billion. that is more than the budget $6.83 billion. that is more than the budget of any other states. if you look at the way city hall is, there is over 100 commissions, boards, advisory boards, so on and so forth that overlap. they can combine a lot of them and save a lot of money. in light of the fact that this tax has already been proposed, it recently expired. how can you see consequences as a result of increasing the sales tax just .5%. it takes money away from the people that needed them most. if you are an upper-middle-class person, it won t harm you. but on lower end, it does harm you. that is why we should not pass if. proponents say that we have to do this to offset the tax at the state level. how do you propose that the city deal with the extraordinary budget cuts that i ve come from the state? proponent to are mostly public employees and employees of nonprofits will have you believe the sky is falling if they don t get this raised. if they go back to 0 base budgeting, do good budgeting, good management, they have plenty of money to run the city. we hope that that was helpful. for information on ballot measures, visit the web site of the league of women voters at sfvotes.org. early voting is available at city hall monday through friday 8:00 a.m. to 8 5:00 p.m. if you don t vote early, vote os to vote for candidates or party and it is a significant way to have our voice heard. exactly 100 years ago, women were given the vote in california. the battle for women s suffrage was not an easy one. it took more than 70 years. a woman could run for president in new york. organizing this conference, basically it modeled itself on a declaration of independence for women. it marked the beginning of the women s equality movement in the united states. at that time, women were banned from holding property and voting in elections. susan b. anthony dedicated her life to reform. suffrage in the middle of the 19th century accomplished one goal, it was diametrically opposed to this idea. many feared it would be corrupted by politics. women in the 19th century had to convince male voters that having the vote would not change anything. that woman would still be devoted to the home, the family, that they would remain pure and innocent, that having the vote would not corrupt them. support gradually grew in state and local campaigns. leaders like ellen clark sgt come repeatedly stopping these meetings , repeatedly stopping these meetings as a politically active figure. doing everything they could to ground the campaign in domesticity. despite their efforts, the link made it tough whenever voters were in the big city. a specialist in francisco. the problem with san francisco is that women s suffrage as an idea was associated. susan b. anthony joined the provision party. a deadly idea in san francisco. liquor was the foundation of the economy. and anything that touched on the possibility of prohibition was greatly and popular. the first campaign was a great effort, but not a success. the war was not over. less than one decade later, a graphic protests brought new life to the movement. women s suffrage, the republican convention in oakland, this time it was the private sector response. 300 marched down the streets of the convention center. women were entitled to be here. joining together for another campaign. women opened a club in san francisco. it was called the votes for women club. if she could get the shopkeepers to have lunch, she could get them to be heard literature. the lunch room was a tremendous success. it was the way that people thought about women willing to fight for a successful campaign. what happened was, the social transformation increase the boundary of what was possible, out word. there were parades and rallies, door to door candidacies, reaching every voter in the state. the eyes of the nation were on california in 1911, when we all voted. it was the sixth and largest state in the nation to approve this. one decade later, we have full voting rights in the united states. helping newly enfranchised women, a new political movement was founded. starting in the 1920 s, it was a movement created by the suffragettes moving forward to getting the right to vote. all of the suffragettes were interested in educating the new voters. non-partisan, not endorsing candidates endorsing candidates, getting the right to vote and one they have their voice heard. the 100th anniversary of women s suffrage is taking place throughout the state. bancroft library is having an exhibit that highlights the women s suffrage movement, chronicling what happened in california, bringing women the right to vote. how long does this mean going on? the week of the 20th. people do not realize that women were allowed to vote as early as the 1920 s. in the library collection we have a