Vaccine hesitancy part 2: Effective strategies for a human-c

Vaccine hesitancy part 2: Effective strategies for a human-centered health campaign


Vaccine hesitancy part 2: Effective strategies for a human-centered health campaign
In my previous article, we examined how quantitative analyses empowered by online networks can both reveal and implement effective human-centered strategies for health interventions. But once we’ve identified a strategy to test, refine, and deploy, how do we sustain an intervention’s effectiveness?
Trust is health’s most valuable player
COVID-19 has made clear that the politicization of health is incredibly dangerous; the health of billions of individuals is at stake, but so too is trust in pharmaceutical companies, in the scientific process, and in government and our regulatory agencies. For example, the White House’s efforts to block updated FDA requirements—which pushed regulatory approval beyond November’s election—and the subsequent reversing of that position shook the public’s trust in the safety of any potential COVID-19 vaccine. That trust was already teetering. Notably, the Reagan-Udall Foundation for the FDA recently reported major public concerns about potential vaccines expressed by members of historically underrepresented groups as well as frontline healthcare workers.

Related Keywords

Athens , Attikír , Greece , Canada , White House , District Of Columbia , United States , Canadian , Tom Nichols , Geotech Cuesbytiffany Vora , Michael Caulfield , Google , Twitter , Facebook , Stanford History Education Group , Udall Foundation , Tech Cuesbytiffany Vora , Reagan Udall Foundation , Stanford History Education , ஏதென்ஸ் , கிரீஸ் , கனடா , வெள்ளை வீடு , மாவட்டம் ஆஃப் கொலம்பியா , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , கனடியன் , டோம் நிக்கோல்கள் , மைக்கேல் கல்பீல்ட் , கூகிள் , ட்விட்டர் , முகநூல் , ஸ்டான்போர்ட் வரலாறு கல்வி குழு , உடல்ல் அடித்தளம் , ரீகந் உடல்ல் அடித்தளம் , ஸ்டான்போர்ட் வரலாறு கல்வி ,

© 2025 Vimarsana