What the SCOTUS decision in juvenile lifer case means for Mi

What the SCOTUS decision in juvenile lifer case means for Michigan


Stateside's conversations with Deborah LaBelle and Efren Paredes
For years, states around the country had laws that made a sentence of life without the possibility of parole mandatory for children who committed serious violent offenses. In Michigan, that meant that some 360 juvenile defendants were sent to prison for life. Over the past decade, a series of U.S. Supreme Court decisions found that those mandatory sentences were unconstitutional. But on April 22, the Supreme Court released a decision — with conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh penning the majority opinion — that complicates those years of reform.
Back in 2012, the Supreme Court said in
Miller v. Alabama that children are different from adults, and sentencing them to life without parole amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, which is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. The court said that only in rare cases — when the defendant displayed “permanent incorrigibility” — could they be sentenced to life without parole. Four years later, in

Related Keywords

Mississippi , United States , Louisiana , Alabama , Michigan , Justice Brett Kavanaugh , Deborah Labelle , Efren Paredes , Claire Anderson Unsplash , Supreme Court , Us Supreme Court , Claire Anderson , Lakeland Correctional Facility , மிசிசிப்பி , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , லூசியானா , அலபாமா , மிச்சிகன் , நீதி ப்ரெட் காவனௌக் , டெபோரா லேபிள் , எப்றென் பாரிடெஸ் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , எங்களுக்கு உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , கிளாரி ஆண்டர்சன் , லேக்லேண்ட் திருத்தம் வசதி ,

© 2025 Vimarsana