Page 10 - 2071 News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Believe we have probable cause that the following statutes were violated and were seeking for evidence to further our investigation this is entirely usual we, would not expect to see donald trump or anybody else's name and the search warrant paperwork asked the target of the investigation. but you not to finish if we do acquit pinot donald trump possible crimes by the numbers, we can glean something from the search for materials. and attachment being, the prosecutors listed exactly what federal statutes they think have been violated. it's a three-year federal felony 2071 which is unlawfully re...

Act. it deals with the quote gathering transmitting or losing defense information. this specific session of the espionage act that federal authorities cited the search warrant concerns collecting transferring or losing information relating to national defense. quote, with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the united states, and quote. the second federal statute that prosecutor site in the search warrant is section 2071, which prohibits the willful unlawful removal of records belong to the government. and finally in the unsealed warrant today, we le...

Potentially classified materials and evidence of crimes. today we learned exactly which laws the justice department had reason to believe may have been violated. what specific items they were searching for and what they took from the immediate past presidents home. here's a second detachment to the warrant. it is titled quote, attachment b. property to be ceased -- all physical documents and records constituting evidence contraband fruits of crime or other items illegally possessed in violation of 18 u.s. code section 793, 2071 or 1519. that string of numbers i just read is actually a set of f...

Believe they did and i acted in good faith. that could be a valid defense if you could convince a juror. that may be all he's got, though. >> let me ask you about the statute, 18 usc 1519, that is typically use and tell me if i'm wrong, it is used to charge obstruction of justice by concealing or destroying evidence. and if we look at attachment b in the warrant, in the letter d under attachment b, any evidence of knowing alteration, destruction or concealment of any government and/or presidential records of any documents with classification markings. how do you read into that. >> i didn't see...

This is a search warrant. we are not at the end of this eval investigation. no one has been charged with any of these statutes at this time, and the other thing that is important to note here is that none of these three things under investigation specify that there is a mishandling of classified documents, investigation going on here. the charge that is being used apparently to investigate this instead is the espionage act. it's not necessarily about classified records. it's about whether or not these records being at the property of mar-a-lago could be harmful to the united states. >> katelyn...