Page 24 - Additional Properties News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Dispense with this item and a right. And i dont believe they are well remove them from the table and i have a list of 7 why dont you read those into the record. First address t is 822 arkansas street and beulah street. Next one is 51 linda street. Next one is 48 majestic avenue. The other one is 581 mall especially e he will street. Another one is 172 raymond avenue and the last is 379 bee street thank you, colleagues would we have a motion to accept the report without objection it will be amended. I want to recognize the deputy city attorney. So the d b i staff has indicated if theres Additio...

Property. Mr. Peters filed this appeal because he knew that the building and the department and the supplying department and all of the permit holders have addressed mr. Peters questions regarding the impact of the project on his retaining Foundation Wall. It outlines the project and does not address the reviews of mr. Peters retaining wall and foundation. And in fact, the plan was engineered without reviewing this retaining wall which is visible only from mr. Peters garage. And i have a picture of the wall. That is the wall and that goes on top. That way . Okay. Mr. Peters wants the permit ap...

Zoning during this time to facilitate the development of the 406 street the Mexican Museum and making the requisite findings. Take a roll call calling names . The ordinance has finally passed. Item 18 is an ordinance of the lawsuit filed against the city it was filed on 2010 in San Francisco supreme court. Can i have a motion to ask his supervisor yee. Supervisor yee will be excused and can i have a motion to excuse supervisor kim supervisor kim is excused and if we could take a roll call on item 18 calling names . The ordinance finally passed. Item 19. Item 19 is an ordinance authorizing the ...

They did not abuse or err in their power as well. Those that are interpreting the ordinance and how it will be implemented and how it seemed to me that that was given to the due consideration and that the qualitative criteria were evaluated and to the determination. And it is not a basis for over turning a decision. I believe i am prepared to move that the appeal be denied that the 309 determination be upheld and i believe that through that, we would also have to adopt sequa finding . That is correct. And that would also be good to state a basis there was no error of interpretation or abuse of...

But in general we know what we own, what its used for, we know what the condition of the building is and whether we are leasing it or lease it, we have a pretty good understanding of where we are. That document is available to anyone anytime they want it. We get calls from people who would like to buy it or lease it. In that sense we disagree with the response, but we actually did what the response asked us to do some years ago. Finding no. 2 is not relevant to us. Finding no. 3 is about keeping Surplus Properties on a list for a finite period of time. I want to give you some examples of the f...