Al Jager News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Thank you, lieutenant sanford. It is a pleasure serving with you. We appreciate everything you are doing and you and sandy and the sacrifices youre making. I pressure staying close to watford, your kids. I cant even get through the first line. This guy is amazing. As a dad, partner, cfo, exactly what state needs right now and is a key part to what we got done this last year. [ applause ] governing is team effort and there are three branches of government and we are well represented here today. We have 4 of the 5 Supreme Court justices that serve our state here today. Including the chief justic...

On episode 5 of The Voice of the People, Nicholas Quallich spoke with North Dakota Secretary of State Michael Howe.

(Bismarck, ND) -- The North Dakota Supreme Court says term limits should be voted on for the November ballot. The high-court ruling sided with supporters of the measure, saying Secretary of State Al Jager "misapplied the law" when it came to invalidating 29,000 of the 46,000 signed petitions turned in earlier this year. The ruling made by the court says of the 29,000 rejected,

(Bismarck, ND) -- A group of North Dakotans looking to add term limits to North Dakota legislators is suing the state, accusing the secretary of state of using a different standard for accepting signatures intended for a ballot measure that would be voted on this November. North Dakota's District 38 Representative and North Dakota for Term Limits Chairman Jarred Hendrix joined

Will be able to vote. >> it's discriminating and disenfranchising to our people to not allow them to vote. it's discouraging on top of that. >> al jager is north dakota's secretary of state. he's trying to implement the new law which is designed to protect the integrity of the vote. what could be simpler than presenting an i.d. saying who you are and where you live. >> pretty simple process. and so others seem to be making it a lot more than it is. it's pretty simple. >> reporter: others seem to be saying you're trying to disenfranchise native american voters, right? >> well, we're not. we wan...