Bob Cherney News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

The principal issue through the appeal related to the scope of project objectives, alternatives and analysis of [speaker not understood] population and employment, transportation, air quality and Greenhouse Gas emissionses in the eir. These issues have been previously addressed in the departments eir comments and responses document published january 9, 2012. Therefore the Planning Department recommended rejection of the eir appeal for reasons stated in its july 9, 2012 responses to appeal memorandum to the board ~ and supplemental staff testimony provided at the previous july 17th, 2012 appeal...

June 12, 2012, the board had the hearing, it now states on july 17th, 2012, and march 12th, 2013, the board held the hearing. And then as our clerk just pointed out, she is not offering the motion. I would suggest that the motion be made by supervisor campos, farrell, and myself. Supervisor campos has made the motion. If i could ask supervisor campos would you also make the motion to amend . So, we make a motion to amend and i think it should be made on behalf of the three supervisors here. So, supervisor campos has made a motion to amend, seconded by supervisor farrell. Colleagues, any object...

e-i-rs tend to be so, i just wanted to make a few quick comments. ~ since this is the first sequel [speaker not understood] here as a member of the board and since this particular environmental impact report started well before i was elected, i just want to offer some brief comments. when evaluating e-i-rs, i believe i have a specific legal obligation. i am asked to determine if the document is adequate, accurate, and objective and reflective of the independent judgment of the city and that's all. this is not a proxy vote on the merits of the project or my feelings about a particular...