Live Breaking News & Updates on Calculation

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Calculation on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Calculation and stay connected to the pulse of your community

CNN This Morning

be if if and when he decides not to testify, who go while we just saw their case, it was a disaster esther, they didn't have anything on me. my attorneys tore down michael cohen and they're joke of okc case and they're joke batch of witnesses. they got nothing. i don't need to take the stand. that's it. that's what he'll say publicly i think that makes sense. >> i think a lot of sense and it's also i think it helps that it's not televised, right? so if it was televising, that might be a little different calculation asked me to the voters if he's trying to filter to the media. i think that's a good point. yeah. if this were televised and he were on the stand, that's interesting. i mean, that would be yeah. that would be a moment elie honig, thank you for starting. >> what's gonna be a long day for you with us thanks. appreciate having you all right. coming up next here. jewish students at columbia university urged to stay home for their own safety as campus confrontations intensified plus north korea accused of firing multiple ballistic missiles just hours ago the white. house correspondents dinner live

The-stand , Fraud-case , Case , Michael-cohen , Witnesses , Attorneys , Anything , Nothing , Joke , Joke-batch , Disaster-esther , Okc

FOX and Friends Sunday

prepared to have a throwdown on a motion to south korea candidate his position as speaker -- vacate. kayleigh: i think democrats will never vote on the border security funding. and he said last night one of the keys for him was the fact that a this was the only way to get aid through for israel. it was unpalatable for democrats to ever pass anything israel stand-alone, so this had to go forward in order to protect the national security of our country in his calculation. pete: i guess. [laughter] i've herald that. i have heard that. you know, i feel like -- yeah. he's dealing with a lot of factors that a morning show host isn't dealing with, so i get that. but you'd love to stand your ground, make your statement and say, hey, we support israel. we're going to put the bill forward. you don't want to deal with it? we'll fight that out in the media. here's our border bill. i know it's not that simple, but that's certainly what people expected. kayleigh: that is the saw sausage making of the legislature.

Kayleigh , Fact , Speaker , Democrat-party , Candidate , Border-security-funding , Position , Motion , Keys , Throwdown , South-korea , One

Fox News Live

mike: to that point, there's hot spots in the world: ukraine, israel, middle east. could this play in either of those conflicts? >> certainly in the middle east this. is a great asset and stuff in the red sea with the houthis and stuff that's in israel and persian gulf with iran and delivering interesting capability to the u.s. and allies. mike: a big expense for conventional aircraft is fuel w. a solar acraft, what kind of savings are you making with this invention? >> this is part of the real game changing calculation here.

Michael-johnson , Israel , Ukraine , World , Point , In-the-red-sea , Play , Middle-east , Asset , Conflicts , Either , Spots

CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield

the opening statements, but i do think they will make a big push to get out there counter narrative, which was there was no fraud here. there was no intention to defraud anybody. this was just an agreement between citizen trump and citizen daniels to pay money to suppress a story which was untrue. but damaging. and so there was a calculation made that like with karen mcdougal or others, we would suppress just like bill clinton did with the so-called bimbo eruptions when he was running no harm, no foul, no intend to defraud private case. government prosecuting me because i'm donald trump to interfere with the election. i think that's their narrative. we'll see how much leeway the judge gives them to make it, though. >> okay. and you say opening statements, it could be just an hour, so that means there would be room for witness number one or two with the judge. >> one but things to keep moving in that respect and get

Statements , Agreement , Citizen-trump , Intention , Narrative , Fraud , Anybody , Big-push , Story , Money , Others , Bill-clinton

All In With Chris Hayes

defense attorney to talk about sandoval. when you have a client in your considering whether you want that client to testify in their own defense, what is a sandoval hearing and how does it figure into that calculation? >> the sandoval hearing figures into that calculation because basically it's going to set up a lot of the theory with which you are going to put forth to the jury because to the extent that your client wants to potentially testify, you have to be aware specifically of what they're going to be cross- examined in regard to prior conduct that may or may not be at issue in this case. to the extent that we are dealing with issues regarding e. jean carroll, to the extent we are dealing with issues regarding the case in front of judge ingle right now, you need to know exactly what the prosecution is going to examine your client on because that's going to dictate the

Hearing , Client , Defense , Calculation , Sandoval , Defense-attorney , Hearing-figures , Jury , Lot , Theory , Extent , Case

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

is a difficult trial client to control and ultimately, whether or not to testify as a client's decision, not the lawyers decision. so it's anybody's guess how this is going to help me with the opening statements calculation. it's been a long time, but i sit in courtrooms and sometimes the prosecution gives this long laundry list instead, it's all my might all be great. it might all be substantive. they might have a great case, but they lose the jury. they just put them since the auc other case are they just come and say we have a lot to talk about over the next six weeks here are the five or six things you need to know today. boom, boom, boom, boom. move on. what do you do here? >> i would do that because what you really want to give them is an overall attempt thousand foot view. and you want to give them, you want let me give them a roadmap. you want to give them kind of inflection points just two points of reference. so they know what's going on as it happens to go into the details and given the whole long-winded story without any context, not going to work, you got to go my cousin vinny, i stand up and say what he just said is bs >> i know. i think you're getting up there forcefully, passionately and with joe jackson mentioned last night, i think when we're on is about jury nullification sometimes

Prosecution , Hush-money-criminal-trial , Lawyers , Statements , Decision , Anybody , Client , Calculation , Courtrooms , His-civil-fraud-verdict , Things , Lot

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

to testify. >> so they'll disregard the evidence. i mean, the reality is starstruck or not, it comes down to the okay. you take as a juror and that allows requires that you follow the law. and there are multiple counts here. so are they going to say with respect to every count there's nothing to see here that ledgers fine. that invoice is fine. i just don't know there are 34 counts, but there's only one lie. >> right? it's just the same lie repeated over and over again. but we know that jurors decide cases based often on emotion and then they back into the logic. so he good do himself a favor by tested. so then how does the defense team work this out? >> then i assume despite what their client says, that there they start this thinking we'd like to keep them off the stand how do you make that calculation as you go, if you think you're losing, you say, okay let's roll the dice, let's put the politician in there. and when a vote is that how you doing wave it's going well for them of cross examination, they will these guys are smithereens. you're turning around and telling your client no way do you get on that stent? now, obviously this

Juror , Evidence , Reality , Respect , Law , Counts , Count , Okay , Jurors , Nothing , Cases , Jak-inhibitors-fine

BBC News

rare bipartisan _ do it now. we have seen some wry rare bipartisan to _ do it now. we have seen some wry rare bipartisan to push _ do it now. we have seen some wry rare bipartisan to push it _ do it now. we have seen some wry rare bipartisan to push it through. | rare bipartisan to push it through. how would you describe the system at the moment? would he say it is dysfunctional? the the moment? would he say it is dysfunctional?— dysfunctional? the american olitical dysfunctional? the american political system _ dysfunctional? the american political system is _ dysfunctional? the american political system is always - political system is always dysfunctional but i think it has been more dysfunctional than usual in the history of that institution. republicans are usually very strong national security. historically make sense for them to support ukraine against russia and we have seen that happening largely because of the donald trump wing of the republican party taking power. what is really important of this vote is that mike johnson is being supported by the democrats. {lin johnson is being supported by the democrats. . , johnson is being supported by the democrats. ., , ., johnson is being supported by the democrats-_ johnson is being supported by the democrats. . , ., , ., ~' democrats. on that, why do you think ou ut his democrats. on that, why do you think you put his job — democrats. on that, why do you think you put his job on _ democrats. on that, why do you think you put his job on the _ democrats. on that, why do you think you put his job on the line _ democrats. on that, why do you think you put his job on the line to - democrats. on that, why do you think you put his job on the line to get - you put his job on the line to get this through? what was the calculation for him in the end? in his mind he believes in the rightness that the ukrainian fight. he believes in right and wrong, this is a moral decision for him. he said that he would do what is right no matter what happened to his job and

Us , System , Bipartisan , Security , Russian , Republican , Institution , History , Sense , Vote , Democrats , Donald-trump

CNN Newsroom With Fredricka Whitfield

they going to go move, move forward if they're not going to move forward today, and that's something that they are struggling with. at this moment, the calculation has to be one. do they have the votes they seem to think they do, but democrats likely would come to save him, although they have now said so officially. and two, they don't they don't really know what the game plan is. if they were to somehow succeed, if they become the dog will catch the car, caught the car. what happens if gel-like johnson? this is vacated. who is the successor? do they did throw this institution yet again into a state of paralysis because this house cannot do anything until a speaker is elected. as we saw last fall. so all those things are part of the discussion. marjorie taylor greene continued to say she's being responsible in this because he's trying to argue that she's not doing what matt gaetz did in the fall which was call for the vote, led to the outro. kevin mccarthy and then republicans had no idea what to do ultimately leading to the election of mike johnson. but mike johnson making the calculation that and deciding it is time to take on those

Something , Democrats , Calculation , Move , One , Mike-johnson , Institution , Two , Car , Dog , Successor , Game-plan

Alex Wagner Tonight

he will not run for office. it is unlikely that he would return to the trump administration. trump hates him. what is he doing here? i spent a lot of time reporting on this and thinking about the psychology of these republicans, who understand who trump is and the threat he poses and still find themselves supporting him. i think it is important to understand that it is not always just a simple case of cowardice. cowardice is woven into the calculation but it is something more complicated. i remember talking to mitt romney about this, the utah senator. he said when you are as entrenched in a political party as somebody like bill barr is, or somebody like mitt romney, you spend decades making friends, allies, getting money from the public institutions. it is really hard to disentangle yourself from that party apparatus. turning on trump in the year

Donald-trump , Lot , Office , Administration , Psychology , Case , Threat , Republican , Something , Somebody , Conservative-party , Calculation