Each. Is there anyone who would like to speak on this item . Ronald rabine, i wish some of the tenants had stayed here. I think this is another step of putting commercial uses ahead of the right of quiet enjoyment. The gentleman said theres protections against turning third floors into businesses but i dont know what those protections are. It seems to me theres no chamber of quality of life, theres no chamber of quiet enjoyment, we might need that. But the idea that business above all and let our space earn money more than let someone quietly live there is a wrong concept and they do this on the railroads too, of course, freight before passengers. I think this is a wrong trend and i urge a no vote on this and im sorry supervisor campos brought this up. Is there anyone else from the public that would like to speak . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Colleagues, can we move this forward without objection . Thank you. Mr. Clerk. Item no. 5 is an ordinance amending the police code reg
Still have oversight over it. Can you explain that a bit . Yeah, i think we would recommend that those funds be held on the controllers reserve and we work with the controller to provide reports to the board on expenditures of funds in excess of 100,000 so that it can be done in effect an administrative matter but still reported to the board in a way the board feels like it has full knowledge and ability to control it if there is something going awry. Why dont we go to the budget Analyst Report. [speaker not understood] reported under the proposed ordinance, the initial mitigation agreement between north star solar and puc would be for 2. 9 million for a procurement of transmission capacity. However, the budget they gave us is actually for higher than that. It is about 2. 9 68 million. Although they didnt have any kind of detailed expenditure plan. So, we are recommending a budget and finance committee reserve on those funds pending budget details. I believe they concur with. The secon
Am a member of casa just cause and i have been living in my apartment more than 5 years. The harassment began when the Property Owner of my unit attempted to overcharge us for utilities. When my husband and i asked her to show us the receipts of the amounts of money that we were paying if we were going to pay the utilities that she was asking us to, she gave us notes that did not have an address, did not have a date, did not have a number, just the amount of money that we supposedly owed. We continued to tell her that this was not going to be an acceptable form of a notice and she did not accept. She began to harass us and tell us we needed to pay us the utilities. She began by screaming at my husband, she went to my daughters work and screamed at her in front of her clients. A couple of days after that, my daughter was fired from her job. She then called my son and started screaming to him over the phone, telling him that she did not care how the money was found but that the light and
And valet operations. Thank you very much. I believe we have a representative from supervisor campos office here. Good morning, supervisors. [speaker not understood] on behalf of supervisor david campos. The legislation before you amends the citys Parking Enforcement laws under the business and tax code. It reduces the bonding requirement for operators that have a strong record of Tax Compliance and simplifies the bonding categories. Additionally, the legislation includes other clarifications and Administrative Changes that ms. Florence mar who manages the business tax section of the treasurer and Tax Collectors Office will present on. Supervisor campos introduced this legislation after hearing from small parking operators that were having a difficult time meeting the high bonding requirements and larger operators that have operated in good faith with a proven record of responsible thirdparty tax collection. The sfmta has informed us that their staff has reviewed the legislation and ha
Money was found but that the light and the water would be paid. Finally she told us that we needed to leave. She gave us a verbal eviction. We told her that verbal evictions are not valid and she became even more angry and has denied giving us anything in writing. My husband and i are seniors with limited incomes and with the help of our children we struggle to pay rent and live in peace in our community. The owners of our home feel that they can do whatever they want against us because and that we dont have any rights but this isnt so. Please support us, please support this legislation and help us ensure that our rights to live in safe housing that is free of this type of harassment is met. Thank you. Thank you. Only for those who have not spoken yet. I didnt use up all my time. Id like 30 seconds. It doesnt work that way. Well, the rent board refuses to hear us because this does not exist. Maam, your time is up. Is there anyone else that would like to speak . Seeing none, Public Comm