Page 21 - Congress Intent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

When asked what kind of judge he would be, how he views this job. Someone comes to argue before me, i treat each one of them equally. They dont come as rich or poor, big guy or little guy. They come as a person. And i put my ego aside when i put on that robe, and i open my mind, and i open my heart, and i listen. He is outdoorsman. He loves to flee fish. He talks about taking judicial clerks to the rodeo ever year. He think it is important for them to get real world downhome experience with those kinds of things. I never thought i would talk about muttonbusting, essentially little kids wrestli...

Unwed mother, a married mother equal to the married father. My only point was that their situation which the court is not a constitutional violation but not granted relief. But not really a situation like this. Not a situation where we say theres an equal protection violation and if we extend the benefit to everybody, we can take care of that equal protection violation, we can remedy the problem. But if we do not, if we try to level down, the effect of that, the party force was proved and equal protection violation gets absolutely no relief at all. I think its relevant and taking into account ...

Unwed mother, a married mother equal to the married father. My only point was that their situation which the court is not a constitutional violation but not granted relief. But not really a situation like this. Not a situation where we say theres an equal protection violation and if we extend the benefit to everybody, we can take care of that equal protection violation, we can remedy the problem. But if we do not, if we try to level down, the effect of that, the party force was proved and equal protection violation gets absolutely no relief at all. I think its relevant and taking into account ...

Unwed mother, a married mother equal to the married father. My only point was that their situation which the court is not a constitutional violation but not granted relief. But not really a situation like this. Not a situation where we say theres an equal protection violation and if we extend the benefit to everybody, we can take care of that equal protection violation, we can remedy the problem. But if we do not, if we try to level down, the effect of that, the party force was proved and equal protection violation gets absolutely no relief at all. I think its relevant and taking into account ...

Unwed mother, a married mother equal to the married father. My only point was that their situation which the court is not a constitutional violation but not granted relief. But not really a situation like this. Not a situation where we say theres an equal protection violation and if we extend the benefit to everybody, we can take care of that equal protection violation, we can remedy the problem. But if we do not, if we try to level down, the effect of that, the party force was proved and equal protection violation gets absolutely no relief at all. I think its relevant and taking into account ...