Page 9 - Constitutional Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

$150,000, part of an agreement she had with the owners of the national enquirer that she wouldn't speak out. >> sure. so it comes down to a contract. this is not some outside law, constitutional question. it's the agreement of the parties, and the court would enforce what's reasonable here. she got $130,000, stormy daniels. she was silent for a particular amount of time. now, the president could sue, assuming that he's a party to the agreement, which i think any court is probably going to find. he could argument that, listen, these disclosures harm me, a million dollars per my don't think that...

Trotted out yesterday as this legal giant and the president had no choice but to follow him despite, his words, contradicted the president's own words. then we find out from "the washington post" that he became so agitated that people were blaming him for writing a memo that trump ordered him to write, that yesterday he even threatened to quit. >> you would wonder, wouldn't the time to quit be when you were initially asked to draft a memo to support an existing argument rather than waiting until after the fact. but that's another question. i want to go to matt ap pews sew, one of the by lines ...

One that called the a.g. and the deputy attorney general in and said i need a memo, and this guy needs to be fired. i've got a very basic question, mike. jeff sessions, the attorney general of the united states of america lied, he lied about his meetings with russia. he said he was involved in the campaign as well, so he could not be involved in this investigation. why is it that donald trump is calling jeff sessions in to consult on the firing of the director of the fbi, a decision that all reporting shows was made because trump was getting sick and tired of comey doing his job and investigat...