Disabled tenant died admiring the process and 3 other tenants are being evicted one is disabled and two dont fit into the categories. The board looked at the property 2 1 2 years ago now the housing costs are rising and hes evicting us to make a profit. The landlord hats evicted us to get out its going from 4 unit to 2 unit. Its like the ellis act was to allow the owners to evict and build something new. The seniors in order to get huge profits its a dislocation of longer san franciscans to leave the area and drive us into homelessness. Those tenants are being replaced by new conforms thank you, very much. Thank you very much. Thank you supervisor avalos for our proposal. Tom director of loveable city. Thank you supervisor avalos. We have a huge for a moment crisis and when youre in a hole we need to stop digging and this was mentioned before really catch the planning code criteria policies up with the housing elements criteria policies that favors keeping housing and those dpaelt towa
A moment here. I can go on to other questions and come back in the hearing. So in terms of youd mentioned the different kinds of no fault evictions on a temporary a evictions for repairs like from a fire or some other issue. And the 10 year moratorium would apply if the tenant then didnt reoccupy the unit after the repair; is that right thats correct. What happens in the tenant decided not to occupy i know from experience in my district with some fires there have been some tenants who excuse me. Found alternate housing they liked and decided to stay there so theres or theres a mix in terms of whether the haernt tenants want to reoccupy. I want to refer to supervisor avalos. Sure thats an issue at a time come up and were heard from the public about that. In our mind there might be a way where the tenant can certify that he or she didnt want to reoccupy the building then the restrictions wouldnt be in place theres a situations if for whatever reason the tenant wont sign i can imagination
Are being evicted one is disabled and two dont fit into the categories. The board looked at the property 2 1 2 years ago now the housing costs are rising and hes evicting us to make a profit. The landlord hats evicted us to get out its going from 4 unit to 2 unit. Its like the ellis act was to allow the owners to evict and build something new. The seniors in order to get huge profits its a dislocation of longer san franciscans to leave the area and drive us into homelessness. Those tenants are being replaced by new conforms thank you, very much. Thank you very much. Thank you supervisor avalos for our proposal. Tom director of loveable city. Thank you supervisor avalos. We have a huge for a moment crisis and when youre in a hole we need to stop digging and this was mentioned before really catch the planning code criteria policies up with the housing elements criteria policies that favors keeping housing and those dpaelt towards housing issues. On the questions of Group Housing we broug
Earthquake so everything is fine. Is that true . Loma prieta was different. The ground acceleration here was quite moderate and the duration was moderate. So anyone that believes they survived a big earthquake and their building has been tested is sadly mistaken. We are planning for the bigger earthquake closer to San Francisco and a fault totally independent. Much stronger than the loma prieta earthquake. So people who were here in 89 they should say 3 times as strong and twice as long and that will give them more of an occasion of the earthquake we would have. 10 percent isnt really the threshold of damage. When you triple it you cross that line. Its much more damage in earthquake. I want to thank you, harvey, thanks pat for p. Good afternoon, well call this meeting ftd Historic Preservation commission to order. Welcome to the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission Regular meeting for october 15, 2014. I would like to remind the audience the commission does not tolerate out
Under the legislation it will apply to mergers and demolitions that is . Conversion from residential use to another utilities not talking about conversion from residential to condo just residential from residential to nonresidential the loss of the unit. So the demolition and the mergers and the major alteration president chiu one followup question i know there have been a number of folks who have commented on on october date is odd. I was if supervisor avalos if you could talk about september 24th what the rationale it we typically have it thirty days after it is signed by the mayor if i may then you can followup. I think we want to have a followup approach towards it and if we were to go back ten years the passage of this ordinance it would alter the language. Id love to be able to look at how we could potentially stop i know the veeksdz that have already happened so we thought it was better to move forward i assume though typically you have it thirty days after the passage well assu