Page 2 - Corner Properties News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And these items shall be heard together first, this is a request for rehearing and the aa b will hear the requests on the items together the aa b in some or all of the cases they will proceeded to rehear the cases the initial request appellant come forward has 7 minutes. Sorry the case numbers are 6804, 2846 washington street heard on may 2015 6805, 2856 washington street and 6806, 2846 washington street and another one i apologize the 2858 the request for rehearing on this case washington have the 2862, and case no. 680823 to divisadero street. Good morning melinda with reuben, junius rose im...

And these items shall be heard together first, this is a request for rehearing and the aa b will hear the requests on the items together the aa b in some or all of the cases they will proceeded to rehear the cases the initial request appellant come forward has 7 minutes. Sorry the case numbers are 6804, 2846 washington street heard on may 2015 6805, 2856 washington street and 6806, 2846 washington street and another one i apologize the 2858 the request for rehearing on this case washington have the 2862, and case no. 680823 to divisadero street. Good morning melinda with reuben, junius rose im...

Short and well be joined by Scott Sanchez the Zoning Administrator who represents the Planning Department and Planning Commission and joe duffy representing the department of Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speak...

Planning code section 305. Specifically, there is no hardship or practical difficulty that justifies essentially 100 percent lot coverage or even if you consider the ally the unbuildable portion. Lot, thats 84 percent coverage. No other home in this neighborhood has or has ever proposed the mass and scale of this project such that finding no. 3 could not be met and last we believe the variance should not be approved unless there is a reduction in the main area to accommodate sufficient rear yard Building Space so we do not create a detrimental precedent for the neighborhood. Thank you for your...

Was going to replace what is currently there, it was just unimaginable to me. Im not objecting to the addition of a second unit, i think im all for im not antigrowth, i think development there is reasonable, but the current scope and size of this thing and the footprint is just beyond my imagination and i respectfully request that as proposed this be denied. Thank you. Thank you. Any further speakers . Good evening, commissioners, my name is jued igt lamb, i am speaking for the Eureka Valley Association Planning and land use committee. We have an interest in this project, we are quite concerne...