Stay updated with breaking news from Debate discussion. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
came _ office who are active members, who came to _ office who are active members, who came to be — office who are active members, who came to be active _ office who are active members, who came to be active memory- office who are active members, who came to be active memory of- office who are active members, who came to be active memory of the i came to be active memory of the commonest— came to be active memory of the commonest and _ came to be active memory of the commonest and socialist - came to be active memory of the commonest and socialist party, i came to be active memory of the i commonest and socialist party, so the assautts — commonest and socialist party, so the assaults to _ commonest and socialist party, so the assaults to our— commonest and socialist party, so the assaults to our democracy- commonest and socialist party, so the assaults to our democracy are | the assaults to our democracy are coming _ the assaults to our democracy are coming from _ the assaults to our democracy are coming from within _ the assaults to our democracy are coming from within our— the assaults to our democracy are i coming from within our democratic system _ coming from within our democratic system and — coming from within our democratic system and they— coming from within our democratic system and they are _ coming from within our democratic system and they are also - coming from within our democratic system and they are also coming l coming from within our democratic- system and they are also coming from without _ system and they are also coming from without a _ system and they are also coming from without a democrat _ system and they are also coming from without a democrat access _ system and they are also coming from without a democrat access to - system and they are also coming from without a democrat access to and - without a democrat access to and i think— without a democrat access to and i think our— without a democrat access to and i think our adversaries _ without a democrat access to and i think our adversaries look - without a democrat access to and i think our adversaries look at - without a democrat access to and i think our adversaries look at the l think our adversaries look at the aoc and — think our adversaries look at the aoc and see _ think our adversaries look at the aoc and see useful— think our adversaries look at the aoc and see useful fools - think our adversaries look at the aoc and see useful fools to - think our adversaries look at the j aoc and see useful fools to help divide _ aoc and see useful fools to help divide this— aoc and see useful fools to help divide this country— aoc and see useful fools to help divide this country and _ aoc and see useful fools to help divide this country and a - aoc and see useful fools to help divide this country and a look- aoc and see useful fools to help divide this country and a look at| divide this country and a look at president — divide this country and a look at president trump _ divide this country and a look at president trump and _ divide this country and a look at president trump and they- ina similarway. in a similar way. highlighting this fact that — in a similar way. highlighting this fact that this _ in a similar way. highlighting this fact that this view— in a similar way. highlighting this fact that this view democracy- in a similar way. highlighting this fact that this view democracy of. fact that this view democracy of capitalism — fact that this view democracy of capitalism is _ fact that this view democracy of capitalism is not _ fact that this view democracy of capitalism is not necessary- fact that this view democracy of| capitalism is not necessary what they think— capitalism is not necessary what they think is _ capitalism is not necessary what they think is the _ capitalism is not necessary what they think is the best _ capitalism is not necessary what they think is the best path - capitalism is not necessary what i they think is the best path forward, but what _ they think is the best path forward, but what they — they think is the best path forward, but what they have _ they think is the best path forward, but what they have not _ they think is the best path forward, but what they have not painted - they think is the best path forward, but what they have not painted the| but what they have not painted the complete _ but what they have not painted the complete picture, _ but what they have not painted the complete picture, the _ but what they have not painted the complete picture, the alternative l but what they have not painted the| complete picture, the alternative is authoritarianism _ complete picture, the alternative is authoritarianism and _ complete picture, the alternative is authoritarianism and that _ complete picture, the alternative is authoritarianism and that is - complete picture, the alternative is authoritarianism and that is the - authoritarianism and that is the debate — authoritarianism and that is the debate discussion— authoritarianism and that is the debate discussion needs - authoritarianism and that is the debate discussion needs to - authoritarianism and that is the| debate discussion needs to have authoritarianism and that is the - debate discussion needs to have with the far— debate discussion needs to have with the far left— debate discussion needs to have with the far left liberal— debate discussion needs to have with the far left liberal base _ debate discussion needs to have with the far left liberal base of— debate discussion needs to have with the far left liberal base of the - the far left liberal base of the democratic— the far left liberal base of the democratic party, _ the far left liberal base of the democratic party, who - the far left liberal base of the democratic party, who are i the far left liberal base of the democratic party, who are in| the far left liberal base of the - democratic party, who are in elected office _ democratic party, who are in elected office today — democratic party, who are in elected office today for — democratic party, who are in elected office today for some _ democratic party, who are in elected office today for some that _ democratic party, who are in elected office today for some that is - democratic party, who are in elected office today for some that is more i office today for some that is more to hurt our— office today for some that is more to hurt our democracy, _ office today for some that is more to hurt our democracy, as - to hurt our democracy, as those people — to hurt our democracy, as those people challenge _ to hurt our democracy, as those people challenge our— to hurt our democracy, as those people challenge our system, . to hurt our democracy, as those - people challenge our system, disrupt the roots _ people challenge our system, disrupt the roots of— people challenge our system, disrupt the roots of our— people challenge our system, disrupt the roots of our democracy, - people challenge our system, disrupt the roots of our democracy, to - people challenge our system, disrupt the roots of our democracy, to push. the roots of our democracy, to push their— the roots of our democracy, to push their agenda — the roots of our democracy, to push their agenda to _ the roots of our democracy, to push their agenda to stop _ the roots of our democracy, to push their agenda to stop president- the roots of our democracy, to push. their agenda to stop president trump can be _ their agenda to stop president trump can be accused — their agenda to stop president trump can be accused of— their agenda to stop president trump can be accused of weakening - their agenda to stop president trump can be accused of weakening this- can be accused of weakening this through— can be accused of weakening this through his — can be accused of weakening this through his own— can be accused of weakening this through his own actions - can be accused of weakening this through his own actions and - can be accused of weakening this. through his own actions and people do, through his own actions and people do. but _ through his own actions and people do. but it— through his own actions and people do. but it is— through his own actions and people do. but it isa— through his own actions and people do, but it is a dual— through his own actions and people do, but it is a dual effort, - through his own actions and people do, but it is a dual effort, it - through his own actions and people do, but it is a dual effort, it is - do, but it is a dual effort, it is not _ do, but it is a dual effort, it is notiust— do, but it is a dual effort, it is not just trump, _ do, but it is a dual effort, it is not just trump, it _ do, but it is a dual effort, it is
right. that was pretty accurate. i am standing by that, i intend to talk a lot. >> tell me how this works in practical terms. i know that it is a 90-day session, i think we are in days or 36. with the day the filibuster rules, work you can effectively spend hours, you can use of hours of the legislative clock and calendar for anything, without anything coming out to vote. through this tactic, by using this tactic, what do you think you could logistically accomplish in terms of stopping legislation, stopping legislation from governing? >> from my back of the envelope, we have approximately 518 maximum hours left of debate discussion and that means that we could pass potentially no more than 42 bills. and, that is not very many, for the entire legislative session. this is a long session and that means that we have to pass a budget.
Окончателно: Актуализацията на пенсиите се отлага, 120 лв. добавки от октомври actualno.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from actualno.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
these seats. if they are tired for mitch mcconnell having the title majority leader. take away the majority. if chuck schumer believed it wouldn't he be banging the drum every day? >> the democrats don't want you to know they have a huge rift in their party. the fact that they are in denial about the fact that without the senate they could do nothing. they could get donald trump out of the white house but legislation and judges, they would be paralyzed. the devotion of time, resources, debate discussion. all of that is lost because they are quibbling whether they want to reorder society with a huge revolution or stabilize the country with normal see with joe biden. that will be ploer tense as we get closer to iowa in february.
to know they have a huge rift in their party not only from the people who believe elizabeth warren, but to the fact, you know, they're in denial about the fact they -- without the senate they could do nothing. they could get donald trump out of the white house, but on judges and everything else, legislation, they would be paralyzed. the thing is these priorities, the devotion of time, resources, debate discussion, all of that gets lost in the fact they are quibbling over whether or not they want to reorder society with a huge revolution or stabilize the country with normalcy with joe biden. it's going to become more tense as we get closer to iowa. >> that was wisdom here. luckily a.b. has decided to stay with us over a break. and coming up as democrats descend on new hampshire, the president suggests that state was actually stolen from him in the last election.
for these seats, if they're tired of mitch mcconnell for having the title majority leader, the way to do that is take away the majority. if chuck schumer really believed in this, wouldn't he be banging that drum every day? >> the democrats don't want you to know they have a huge rift in their party not only from the people who believe elizabeth warren, but to the fact, you know, they're in denial about the fact they -- without the senate they could do nothing. they could get donald trump out of the white house, but on judges and everything else, legislation, they would be paralyzed. the thing is these priorities, the devotion of time, resources, debate discussion, all of that gets lost in the fact they are quibbling over whether or not they want to reorder society with a huge revolution or stabilize the country with normalcy with joe biden. it's going to become more tense as we get closer to iowa.
out any debate discussion of trump's foreign policy and what might be a success. so this bluster might be self defeating. >> i have another question for peter. quickly, elise, for you, even if the decision was made by national security team, it still happened under his watch, so he takes credit for it. >> yes, that's true. i mean, look, the president is the commander in chief. a lot of other times, you know, a lot of aides are given a little more credit. but a lot of these decisions are made by the commander in chief. so president trump and all his like to have glory is it able to claim those successes by himself. but certainly it's a whole cabinet, a whole national security team that helps him make these decisions. >> i think it's a very fair point about droning out. because a lot of times he steps on his own message. >> exactly. >> instead tweeting about other things. peter, recent cnn poll found more than 6 in 10 americans
single digits instead of double digits, low single digits instead of high single digits, things like that. >> gene, you wrote about mitt romney's debate discussion on fema. i'm going to guess you were probably against what mitt said. >> yeah, i thought it was a stupid thing to say, joe. frankly, i suspect if you were to bring governor romney on the program right now and ask him about what he said. all of the responsibilities to the states, i think he'd say, well, of course i didn't mean that and that's what he always says when confronted with something dumb he said in the past. but there is a larger point about the sort of shell game in my opinion the romney/ryan budget plays, which is just to say take the federal government's unfunded liabilities and send them down to the states and go like that
the south. and on super tuesday you're looking at states like texas and oklahoma and virginia and tennessee. it's very difficult for a mormon to win those votes. i said on this program from the beginning of this pass that the rally was about going out there and say, look at me, i'm a christian, i'm not a mormon, vote for me. it's working very well for rick. >> jim moore, dave weigel, harold cook. stay with us. we're staying on the debate. we have a little bit more coming up. stay with us. we're right back. >> he had $800 billion worth of stimulus in the first round of stimulus. it created zero jobs. half of zero jobs is going to be zero jobs. >> the candidates were going after the president inside the debate. outside, tea partyers are still looking for a birth certificate. i thought we were done with that garbage. our debate discussion continues. on jobs, the president sent
oklahoma and virginia and tennessee. it's very difficult for a mormon to win those votes. i said on this program from the beginning of this pass that the rally was about going out there and say, look at me, i'm a christian, i'm not a mormon, vote for me. it's working very well for rick. >> jim moore, dave weigel, harold cook. stay with us. we're staying on the debate. we have a little bit more coming up. stay with us. we're right back. >> he had $800 billion worth of stimulus in the first round of stimulus. it created zero jobs. half of zero jobs is going to be zero jobs. >> the candidates were going after the president inside the debate. outside, tea partyers are still looking for a birth certificate. i thought we were done with that garbage. our debate discussion continues. on jobs, the president sent his bill to congress. tonight, one staffer is admitting republicans will block