Doris Kibbe News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Fred . Thank you so much, jim. We have so much more straight ahead in the next hour of the news room, which begins right now. Hello again. Thank you for joining us. Im fredricka whitfield. Donald trump continues his full on attack of the eight women now accusing him of Sexual Misconduct and the journalist reporting the stories. Trump is speaking right now at a rally in portsmouth, new hampshire. Take a listen to what he said a few minutes ago. These allegations have been, many of them already proven so false. And, in fact, the other one with people magazine. The butler said it was a total lie....

Who were they? >> me, my son and rhonda. >> did you say, what happened to cody? >> yeah, i always thought i failed, as a father, to protect my son. i didn't know what happened to him. >> reporter: a mystery to the family, especially since cody didn't have bruises or internal injuries to his soft tissue. what no one knew at the time, one person stepped forward to police. that person, doris kibbe, rho a rhonda's grandmother said she was an eyewitness to jim harming his son. >> start from the beginning. >> reporter: this is 1994 police video obtained by cnn where doris describes to detectives wha...

There was one problem, doris wasn't telling the truth. do you think jimmy was charged because of that lie? >> i do. yes, of course. >> reporter: many say doris made up the story to protect rhonda and keep the kids from being put in foster care because police would have a man. in an interview with cnn, doris, now 87 admits jim never touched cod cody. >> i said i'll swear on my grave and everything else, jim did not hurt him. >> reporter: doris later recanted her statement to law enforcement. it was never used in the case. the damage was already done. prosecutors moved forward to trial. jim was ...

Break. no bruising on the skin or layers above the bones. >> right. and the problem is the grandmother lied. the district attorney, then the grandmother recanted and her testimony was not used at trial. just come up with every time he's testifieded. the defense attorney did not have this testimony when he went to trial. and under in law, two rounds to reverse a conviction, fred, ineffective stance of counsel means the defense attorney blew it and newly discovered evidence. will the appellate division this time -- as newly discovered evidence, tha the test. see what happens. >> how complicated ...

Duncan would be able to get a new trial 21 years later and now, a doctor is willing to say there's a thing such as infantile rickets and the child may have had that condition, meaning bones were easy to break. >> the grandest aspiration of the law is to seek truth and get to the truth. the difficulty here is that the arrest was predicated on a lie of the mother-in-law and then you had the expert testimony of dr. morris, who ascribed the injuries as broken bones and again, you couple that with the grandmother or the mother-in-law and that's where the conviction is. the problem in the case is th...