Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180904:18:29:00
Answering that question, first they said they felt it would violate the cannons of ethics, there are no cannons of ethics that preclude a response. then they said that they felt a decision might come before them, an issue in a case that might arise, and more recently they've adopted the mantra that they think all supreme court decisions are correctly decided, but you are in a different position. you've been nominated to the highest court in the land and your decisions as a potential swing vote could overturn even well-settled precedent and there are indications in your writings, your opinions,...