Page 8 - Editing Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Jessica, they are making the case this was not them. it went to edit. the facts were taken out in the editing process. final thoughts. >> it's a confusing trail. originally pitched as a news piece, it went to editorial. everyone wants to hang them out to dry. we need to see the book but i would push back on the idea there was no new information. there absolutely was new information. for a lot of people longstanding issues since those kavanaugh hearings with the justice's temerment and how exposed himself to be hot headed and yelled at amy klobuchar and lied about the devil's triangle and not b...

Information from the article jeffrey palmer's house a big in the "new york times." real estate developer out >> there was no desire to here in california. withhold important why did they go to those information from our readers. we have all of it in the book. during the editing process lengths? clearly had you folks in there was an oversight and hollywood threatening that they would be trying to get the names of people showing this key detail about the up at jeffrey palmer's house fact that the woman herself to try to black ball them has told friends she doesn't from hollywood, guys. remember ...

>> martha: the latest on this, "the new york times" reporter behind that evolving kavanaugh story now doing some cleanup, simply insisting that it was an oversight that the original report did not include the key detail that the alleged victim does not recall the incident and made that very clear and has said this, and has said that all along. >> during the editing process there was an oversight in this key detail about the fact that the woman herself has told friends she doesn't remember it and has not wanted to talk about it. got cut and it was an oversight and the times adjusted we are very...

Office. and then almost immediately the story fell apart. sunday night the newspaper was forced to make a devastating correction to the piece. in fact, the woman that kavanaugh supposedly attacked didn't remember anything about the event. and just like so many previous stories about brett kavanaugh, the whole thing turned out to be a crock. so last night kelly and pogevin on a show highly familiar with botched stories. the explanation don't blame us, blame our editors. >> what happened with that omission that the "times" later felt belonged in the piece? >> well, first of all, lawrence, there ...

>> sandra: the place the blame squarely on the editors for omitting those very important facts. here is the authors' explanation. >> there was no desire to withhold important information from our reeders. we have all of it in the book. it's an adaptation of the book that we had to edit. during the editing process there was an oversight and this key detail about fact the woman herself has told friends she doesn't remember it and doesn't want to talk about it got caught. it was oversight. the times adjusted it and we're sorry it happened. >> a sad day for journalism with "the new york times." th...