Justices seem to take city's side in homeless encampment regulation
The court appeared split along idealogical lines, a signal they could side with the Oregon city and say homelessness should be regulated by local officials.
Stay updated with breaking news from Eighth Amendment. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The court appeared split along idealogical lines, a signal they could side with the Oregon city and say homelessness should be regulated by local officials.
It’s now a year since barrister Marie O’Shea submitted a review to Government on the adequacy of the State’s abortion laws. One of the report’s recommendations was the removal of the mandatory three-day waiting period
Joe daniel price/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- A majority of Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared sympathetic to an Oregon city making it a crime for anyone without a permanent residence to sleep outside in an effort to crack down on homeless encampments across public properties.The case, City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, carries enormous stakes nationwide as communities confront a growing tide of unhoused residents and increasingly turn to punitive measures to try to incentivize people to take advantage of social services and other shelter options."These generally applicable laws prohib...
The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case about whether a city in Oregon banning camping outside on public streets and parks violates the Constitution.
The case is considered the most significant to come before the high court in decades on homelessness, which is reaching record levels in the U.S.