Fourth Amendment Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

judge permitting them to enter. the search by a large uniformed team -- ununiformed team, excuse me, took hours and included getting into trump's safe. mr. trump who announced the search in a statement on his website railed against it claiming prosecutorial misconduct and political persecution. he was in manhattan at the time in preparation for an upcoming deposition, part of the civil investigation by the new york state attorney's office into his organization's finances. the former president's lawyer was at the scene in florida and called it an unannounced raid to seize paper. white...

Im todd piro in for rob schmitt. President trump is willing to do just that if it means securing border. Griff jenkins live in washington, d. C. Where congress is not expected to take action any time soon, good morning, griff. The president wants a wall and wants it now and wants to do whatever it takes to get it. I would will willing to shut down government if democrats dont give us votes for border security, lets get rid of lottery and go to system immigration based on merit, we need great people coming into the country. The threat reverses where things appear to be heading into the weekend,...

Technology. my guess is that originalists and scalia in particular, would disagree. so what do you do if the text of the fourth amendment doesn't answer a question? where do you go next? >> well, senator, just to clarify what i intended to say and i may well have misspoken, there is an originalist take, i think, on the question of what happens with a cell phone. as the supreme court held in the riley case, there was a way in which you assess principles of the constitution, the text of the constitution and apply it to modern technology. and you have to because there's no question that cell phon...

So the original meaning of fourth amendment won't tell you what to do with the new technology. original actual sentencings in scalia in particular would disagree. what do you do if the text of the fourth amendment doesn't answer a question. where do you go next? >> just to clarify and i may have misspoken, there's an originalist take on the question of what happens with a cell phone. as the supreme court held in the riley case, there was a way in which you assess principals of the constitution and apply it to modern technology. you have to because there's no question cell phone exist at the ti...

Do with a new technology. my guess is that originalists, and scalia in particular, would disagree. so what do you do if the text of the fourth amendment doesn't answer a question? where do you go next? >> well, senator, just to clarify what i intended to say, and i may well have misspoken, there is an originalist take, i think, on the question of what happens with a cell phone. as the supreme court held in the riley case, there was a way in which you assess principles of the constitution, the text of the constitution, and apply it to modern technology. and you have to because there is no quest...