Page 46 - Frederick Smith News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Factually incorrect story on the front page of the sunday november 17th edition. i hereby challenge a.g. sulsberger, publisher of the "new york times" and business section editor to a public debate. focus of the debate should be federal tax policy in a relative societal benefit of business investments and you scrolled the prompter and i can't read any more of it. it went on to talk about lower and middle class pages and how this tax cut affected that you might ask yourself if you know anything about frederick smith he has been a supporter of republican and g.o.p. causes over the years. maybe t...

Before he became the chairman of the national council. he had a radio show. he back in 2000 17 said the chairman of fedex. if you make the united states a better place continue to vest there is no question in my mind that we would see a renaissance of capital investment. pete: 6 billion back into the economy as opposed to 1.5 billion in taxes. how much money does the "new york times" pay in taxes? steve: according to charles payne, they paid zero in one year. pete: oh, zero. steve: that was in mr. smith's retort to them as well. meanwhile, over the weekend, all eyes were on atlanta because col...

What did he do? was it bribery? no. do you know of any crimes he committed? no. all right. pete: why are we here? steve: there you go. the "new york times" had a headline yesterday. it was quite tantalizing how fedex cut its tax bill to zero and in the story it said that fedex cut its tax bill from 1.5 billion to zero. the effective tax rate from 34% to less than zero. and the whole point of it was, you know, they utilized the trump tax cuts to get that. but what they said was the tax cut was supposed to encourage capital investment but the "times" didn't do that. that's -- rather, fedex did n...

Who runs fedex, frederick smith put this out. "new york times" published al factually incorrect story on the front page on sunday. i hereby challenge the publisher of the "new york times" and the business section editor to a public debate. the focus should be about federal tax policy and the relative societal benefits. anyway, challenging people to a debate. >> he also pointed out by the way "new york times" guess what you paid in taxes. zero. so, pot meet kettle. except you invested 118 million into the society and we invested $6 billion. i like to see them have this debate. pete: have it on ...

saying the one to go to america? and i thought well, i don't really know anything about america, don't know anything of its politics for a particular interest in the place. but i do know one thing and i know this from films it's quite sunni and we were sick of living in brussels. i don't know if you remember in the olden days milk came in bottles and they got clouded up in the capitol. so we thought that we would give it a go. on the basis we have frankly no knowledge and not a huge amount of interest. we decided to accept the offer of the job and i say this because my family had ver...