Page 2 - Gordon Problem News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

This, but it's highly likely that mcconnell and schumer will come together and set the rules that will be voted on before john ronberts walks in that doo because they toedon't want to p roberts in that position. we'll talk about that more starting in december, michael. >> thank you. >> thanks. i'll put that in my pipe and smoke it. meanwhile, ambassador sondland's stunning testimony also featured a lot of smirks and smiles. jeanne moos has the ever-changing moods. >> reporter: it could leave you in stitches. wonderful day crocheting and watching the impeachment as they needle each other. >> ...

Which is essentally code for quid pro quo. look. sondland has real credibility problems. he had to go back and amend his testimony. he had to say, i now recall speaking individually with mr. yermak where i said that resumption of usaid would not occur until ukraine -- he suddenly recalls, oh, guess what? there was a quid pro quo. i proposed it. >> we haven't got on the the july 26th phone call. >> this is going to be key. this is the phone call we just learned about from david holmes. sondland never mentioned it during his deposition, in fact, he even attempted to deny it. he says, i don't rec...

Think particularly dan goldman will go after. it'll be interesting. >> remember what sondland said to taylor's aide. he does not care about ukraine. he cares about investigating the bidens. that comes to mind because the people who he had the closest relationship with in regards to ukraine and this goes back to u.s. national security and why it matters, is sondland and giuliani. not ukraine experts, right? and we heard this week and last week from so many credible, impressive experts that if the president really cared about learning what was going on on the ground there and why it matters in t...

Testimony, is he totally clean now? is he in the clear for being charged for being dishonest or perjury? >> probably. probably. he cleaned it up in a sufficient time to allow the committee to carry on its business. sometimes people are investigated under these kinds of circumstances. i think, you know, an investigation is one thing. actually being charged is another. i think he's probably okay with respect to that given the fact he did clean it up, but, you know, he didn't talk about the famous phone call that we all know about now as i said. why did he leave that out? did he know about it at ...

Point. that's the point of this whole thing. was it okay to push ukraine to investigate the booirdens and basically everyone we heard from said no. >> what's interesting is yesterday you heard them all describe the same fact pattern. but when asked if it was bribery or extortion, they said no. >> that's now where we're at. the big debate is republicans saying, okay, maybe you all say this is long, but does it rise to the level that nancy pelosi has invoked? that's a relatively thin read even though it's a very important point. morrison testified he didn't think it was illegal or improper, but ...