Stay updated with breaking news from Hillcrest. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
to non-public school placements is that we just have contracts with them and we could assign people. we could take a child from one non-public school and move them to oaks or take them from oaks and move them somewhere else and that would be problematic, and would like to acknowledge that.in the case of the non-public schools we just say these are the non-public schools that we re going to contract with and it s placement, et cetera. so we don t actually vote on the amount of money we re giving to each non-public school that. is what makes this a little different. exactly right, commissioner wynns, which is why this particular reso $13 million the entire non-public school budget and to give her the advice to declare and abstain from this kind of discussion for the very reason you very articulately said. the question arises just like i think when commissioner fewer was you been talking about. we talk about what strategies we have to spend less money on non-public sch ....
supermajority that the democracies democrats have and what is happening after prop 30? that people in capitol seem dobto be deluded that we have a lot of new money and that we have to be prepared for that. also, i think the most important part is that we re developing agenda for what sfusd wants to accomplish legislatively in the coming session, in the coming year. so in this draft form it was given to all members of the board, but we should discuss that at sometime with the whole board i think. we also had the review of the informational items that you see there, the third and fourth one. one was the policy on the community relations policy. this was our rules committee work on the next part of the rules and policy review that we re doing with csba and we ll continue to do that. last item i think is very important and ask the leaders of the board next year to be a little more assertive at asking all of the committees to which we have referred other components of the po ....
until the end of the month and she submitted an extension of her time until the 30th of november. commissioner maufas? i guess you are not comfortable with this, but you have mentioned it and i will mention it as well. the discussion between the principal and miss olsen saying somebody is going to start on the 30th and she submitted a second resignation letter changing the date to the 30th. sounds like that is the reason. i am not going to project, but just guess on my own. and then on the 14th, miss olsen said you have an email asking the principal is it possible to be reinstated. is that correct? she submitted a second resignation letter to hr, changing the date to the 30th and that might have been after the cation conversation that you just mentioned and she asked the principal is it possible to be reinstated? she submitted the second resignation form on the 13th, requesting an effective date of 11/30, on the 13th. the day after that, the 14th, she remailed the ....
somebody is going to start on the 30th and she submitted a second resignation letter changing the date to the 30th. sounds like that is the reason. i am not going to project, but just guess on my own. and then on the 14th, miss olsen said you have an email asking the principal is it possible to be reinstated. is that correct? she submitted a second resignation letter to hr, changing the date to the 30th and that might have been after the cation conversation that you just mentioned and she asked the principal is it possible to be reinstated? she submitted the second resignation form on the 13th, requesting an effective date of 11/30, on the 13th. the day after that, the 14th, she remailed the principal and asked if it was possible to be reinstated. then on the 16th, she emailed the principal that she did not get a response? that she was talking to the union. is that when the principal says it would be better to talk to the union? yes. okay. thank you. commi ....
and we re not hearing about revoking the resignation until late in november, is that correct? the 30th of november. the resignee sent out an email stating to staff that she resigned, is that correct? yes, she did. so when she put into motion wanting to revoke her resignation, she was actually past the timeframe of the parameters of when she could revoke? yes, she was. commissioner mendoza? i was wondering why we moved it from the 17th to the 30th? she submitted that and it was con [srao-epbts/] for us as well. con convenient for us as well and it s my understanding that the new teacher who was hired would not be available until the 1st of the month and asked her if she would stay until the end of the month and she submitted an extension of her time until the 30th of november. commissioner maufas? i guess you are not comfortable with this, but you have mentioned it and i will mention it as well. the discussion between the principal and miss olsen sa ....