Democracy has to be at the threshold. that s what all also believed in, what the whole system is founded upon. so, if people can t vote, they can t have their votes counted, they can t have their votes listened to as policy is being formulated, what s the point? you have the ability to sort of cut through and find a really comfortable spot to stand on, which says i m not going to be neutral when democracy is on the line. it s all some writing this time. it s not stuff we re learn with big scoops. he s running as an autocrat. how do you solve for that? what is your advice? it goes against everything we re taught to do, to flatly
Executive pleaded guilty to one count of falsifying records as part of a bribery scheme. he was sentenced to one year of partial imprisonment, spending monday evenings through wednesday evenings at rikers dale but was free other days. a 30 year veteran of the new york police department. he had an article in the maritimes, i supervised new york city judgesme now. the normal order of operations is the person convicted sits down for an interview and the probation officer writes up a memo. how do they come to the conclusions and how important are those recommendations? it is called a presentencing investigation and report that follows from it. one thing you mentioned in the lead up is the indictments he has pending. i really don t think that should factor in at all, because he is presumed innocent. what could ultimately factor in for another person just
Before i get to rubio very quickly. marjorie taylor greene who s easy to dismiss because of her outlandish rhetoric told me in a conversation outside the speaker s office that she would withhold various funds from various prosecutors and suggested that chuck schumer should intervene if he wants those funds in the new york case that convicted donald trump, and get the judge to overturn it. i mean, these things, katy, would be, again, easy to dismiss, because they re from fringe elements of the party, but unlike ten years ago, five years ago, seven years ago, the fringe elements of the party are driving the agenda. so i think that you could foresee if trump is in the white house, and republicans are in the house majority, that we re just going to be in a forget, you know, leave aside january 6th who was horrific in and of
because we have a responsibility here, congress has a very particular duty on to the constitution, we have the responsibility of oversight and that s what we have been engaging in, we have the responsibility to legislate an appropriate. and we talk about funding for prosecutors and alvin bragg by some estimates are early estimates he received almost $1 million of federal taxpayer funds in the last year to do what? to have politicized prosecutions a political opponent of his party? he ran on that. that was the promise of his election to s. neil: i certainly understand where you re coming from mr. speaker, but are you up and rising to the house the same way you say democrats are weapon isaac the doj to get what they wanted? ages doing it in a bigger platform, the entire house of representatives? it know, it is a very clear distinction between what we are doing and what they have done in weapon rising the judicial system, what we re doing it nihilism the opposite a guy hit
And now that we have left the eu we need to be pragmatic about what happens, we need to start with building the relationships and getting back the trust that has been lost and damaged between us and our european partners, we want to look at some of those side agreements and the youth mobility schemes, mutual recognition and professional qualifications. i recognition and professional qualifications. . . recognition and professional qualifications. i will go back to the 2019 lib qualifications. i will go back to the 2019 lib dems qualifications. i will go back to the 2019 lib dems manifesto, . qualifications. i will go back to the 2019 lib dems manifesto, itj qualifications. i will go back to - the 2019 lib dems manifesto, it was very clear, and we had left. we were about to leave, stop brexit, it says, do you still want to stop brexit? in says, do you still want to stop brexit? ii says, do you still want to stop brexit? :: ., , ., brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity still brexit? in 2019 there was an opportunity still to brexit? in 2019 there was an i opportunity still to stop brexit by democratic means. what we are saying now, we are in a different place. you don t want to overturn it? taste you don t want to overturn it? we need to you don t want to overturn it? - need to move back to a closer relationship with europe and we have a four step process and i was talking you through the steps. i want to be clear, and you can say