Page 2 - Isnt Extra Information News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Also an attorney who represents victims, a former prosecutor. she deals with families after airplanedy sasters. and mr. david suecy, no sloich himself. author of "why planes crash." thanks to both of you. possibilities. things are possible at this point. right? that's a very low standard of proof and that's part of the frustration for the families certainly. so investigators say this morning, we don't know if we're ever going to be able to find that out. true. incontrovertible, not worth debating, maybe you do never know. the question is, what do you know. even though, david, you believe they ...

You. so the earthquake in chile comes, as we mentioned, just five days after a 5.1 magnitude quake shook the los angeles area. there have been well over 150 aftershocks since then. they has people wondering about a possible connection. indra petersons is taking a look at that. >> the one thing we need to remember, these are two very seismically active regions. we're talking about a 8.2 earthquake across that plate in south america. los angeles is a completely different plate. keep in mind, just in the last month of march in chile, they already had a handful of quakes over 5.0. other than the c...

Their release yesterday. that they increased the cockpit security measures. the measures they put in place including having the flight attendant go in the cockpit, that's been the rule in the united states. also practicality. if there's only one pilot in the cockpit and he or she passes out or dies, that's happened, then the flight attendant can let the other pilot back in the cockpit. we've had those rules for a long time. it's pretty common sense. >> if they haven't had those rules, i really commend them for continuing to make changes. a lot of times in these investigations, they will sit an...

What they're doing. they're not holding anything back. that is -- mary can speak to the legalities. as far as the informations i've known, i've done several that were criminal, and we were restricted from releasing information. >> restricting information is good and promising because it shows some type of trail. what if that's not what it is? what if this is blind conjecture of their trying to figure out why the plane turned and they're just deeming it criminal? but it means something to the families. certainly means something to the families of the pilots. >> well, it also means something to ...

The problem is, when you lose credibility with the passenger families, you get them doing things like -- like peculiar kepting your officers or having sit-ins or things like that. they've lost people's confidence. now it's going to be somebody else who's going to have to give the definitive word on the investigation. >> they're still leading the investigation, though. is there a way to make up for the embarrassment? they have acknowledged that things were slow to pick up in the beginning, but are they gaining ground at all now? i was talking to david about this earlier. he said that also assis...