Isnt Precedent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Happening again. liz cheney just said that in her floor remarks. they are attaching legislative purpose to this investigation to try to counteract that argument. jake, i have one other question for you as someone who's been covering the hill. you heard barbara wade talking about precedence. isn't precedent the thinking among republican leadership here in how they're advising their members to vote on this? are they not at all concerned if and when the shoe's on the other foot, if they should take back the house next year that having congressional subpoenas not being worth very much could come b...

The "new york times." thanks for being with us. frank, even if nancy pelosi hands over the articles of impeachment tomorrow, right now senate democrat leader chuck schumer and senate majority leader mitch mcconnell are at an impasse how to run the trial. do you see any chance of a senate trial happening as soon as january 8th like we talked about a little bit ago? we're all guessing here. i find it a little hard to believe, and you know, we're all at a disadvantage. it's only the third time the nation has gown down this route and only the third time. hard to say here's how it gone before and h...

That said joseph smith is a servant of satan. he's allowed to say that under the first amendment anywhere they want and the right to do that, the idea this person would be chosen by the state department to represent our nation at the opening of an embassy is simply wrong. for representative kennedy to call him, apologize to him is absolutely inexplicable. jeffers should be apologizing should be apologizing to people of utah and my faith and other faiths. >> interesting the president respects him even though he made that out there statement. police now need a warrant if they want to search ve...

Big donors getting stronger and stronger headed toward 2016. >> i think that's right. on the law i think this case was wrongly decided, which is law school code for just saying you disagree with it. what it means to me is that there isn't precedent, there isn't support for this. this is another example of where chief justice john roberts has really changed the rules as they're being played, whether people notice that and how controversial that becomes is i think a test of how much people pay attention to this. citizens united, as you know, perry, has a bad reputation. on the politics, though, ...

Right to do. he had no right to write the letter. it was a political item. that's all it was. by a reagan appointee. >> andrea: he is trying to politicize the court. you don't think the remarks -- >> bob: is there precedent to write a letter to executive branch? is there precedent? >> andrea: there isn't but there also isn't precedent for what the president did. >> bob: sure there is. >> kimberly: the criticism going back and forth is bush has had problems with the supreme court, too. but when you compare and contrast how the administration handled this, very different. >> dana: we lost big ca...