Jack Daniel's v VIP Products: Ninth Circuit decision leaves trademark
Applying heightened First Amendment protection to a commercial product sets a dangerous new precedent, says Julia Anne Matheson of Potomac Law Group.
Stay updated with breaking news from Jack Daniel Properties. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Applying heightened First Amendment protection to a commercial product sets a dangerous new precedent, says Julia Anne Matheson of Potomac Law Group.
The justices have agreed to hear a trademark dispute with First Amendment overtones involving a dog toy’s bathroom humor and a distinctive whiskey bottle.
This is the second time Jack Daniel's has filed a petition for certiorari in connection with this case.
The Supreme Court agreed on Nov. 21 to hear a trademark infringement case brought by Jack Daniel’s against ...
In April 2022, INTA filed an amicus brief (pdf here) supporting Jack Daniel's petition for en banc rehearing of the BAD SPANIELS decision in VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc.