Page 47 - Landmark Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And their grandmothers. so, this is that type of fundamental question where we should suspend or reform or eliminate the filibuster in order to pass the women's health protection act. >> now, you've got at least real couple of republicans who, in some fashion, have suggested that they would not support the overturning of roe v. wade, but susan collins and lisa murkowski have proposed a different bill. given that you're a cope sponsor of this bill, i remember conversations between you and them oath whether or not there something you can all agree to? >> so we have to look at the substance of th...

After a half century, this subject continues to touch a nerve

Lying to her. saying that their votes to overturn roe v. wade are, quote, completely inconsistent with what justice gorsuch and justice kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office. here is what they said in their hearings. >> well, let's go to a more controversial issue. but, along the same lines i've been asking you. i think the case that most people are thinking about right now, and the case that every nominee gets asked about, ravi weight. can you tell me whether roe was decided correctly? >> senator, again, i will tell you that roe v. wade, decided in 1973, is a presi...

Planned parenthood versus casey in 1992. and as you well recall, senator, i know when that case came up, the supreme court didn't just reaffirm it in passing, the court specifically went through all the factors of stare decisis in considering whether overruling. and that going to pinion that justice kennedy and justice o'connor and justice souter, at great length, went to those factors. that was the question percentage in the case. robert pork, showed them how to testify in those hearings. robert bork by telling the truth showed them they should never, ever tell anything like the truth about w...

This really radicalized supermajority now there are six. not five conservative justices. to transform the law simply because it has the votes. in area after area and what i would say to senator murkowski. is brace yourself, brace for self on a whole bunch of things that maybe are not as important to you as abortion but gun rights, on the ability of federal agencies to issue regulations. on the separation of church and state. on affirmative action next term at the court. this is a court that is in the operation and the mission of transforming the law. >> we have a written statement by president...