Stay updated with breaking news from Largeer. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Long-standing state of constant tension that is unlikely to ever change. while romney was dealing with the controversy over his nearly 5-month-old remarks president obama was confronted with the open redistribution of wealth rhetoric from 14 years ago. the trick is figuring out how do we structure the government systems that pull resources, and facilitate some redistribution? because i believe in redistribution. at least at a certain level to make sure that everybody has a shot. i disagree. a society on government-centered nation where government plays a largeer and larmer goal, redistributes mup is the wrong course for america. that will not build a strong america or help people out of poverty. the right course for america is create growth, create wealth. not redistribute wealth. romney and the republican party hope to turn things around and planning new barrage of attack adds and say mr. obama comments from 14 ....
Investigation of what took place here we will find out that we should have had a much largeer and capable security force of our own, protecting that consulate. bret: how does this happen, do you think, general, on 9/11? the 11th anniversary on 9/11. it s libya, it s volatile. you have an ambassador who just was not protected. guest: yeah. it s a tragedy. the investigation i m convinced will get to the bot of the of it. clearly security was inaccurate. it s outrageous that armed goons like that could penetrate our facility, kill four americans inside and wound a bunch of others and just destroy the place. bret: the marines you talk about, you hear about the detachment, the different embassies. really, they re about the internal part of embassy. not a major protection of the embassy, itself. guest: absolutely. it s internal to the embassy. still there if something penetrates. when the ambassador is on the move or one of his staff is on ....
How much money they spent on it. given they spent tens of millions on the ads. trying to tear down romney and build up obama. we still see this as a deadlock race. so, depends. we don t know whether he is wasted the money or not. it s cliche. we won t know until election day. john: charles, president obama, the obama campaign spending money at least the romney campaign spending money at three-fifth the rate of the obama campaign. the obama campaign had a largeer figure. almost $600 million compared to under $500 million. is that an indication of what? i think kirsten is right. they see their only hope is to run a micro managed constituency oriented campaign. the constituency is, you know, dangled some kind of benefit. free contraceptive. cutting student loan. hispanic, the dream act. every constituency has a goodie handed out as we approach election day. perhaps i m naive. if you have a record of the administration, then you then ....
Mean. john: over the years, of course, various presidential candidates released differing numbers and differing years of tax returns. john mccain returned two. others released six or more. steve forbes famously in 1996 said forget it, i m not giving you anything. why, charles, does the president seem to think that the issue here in this campaign are mitt romney s tax returns as opposed to the other big issues that people want to hear about? if it s on the big issues, he loses. if it s on the big things he did, stimulus, obamacare, cap and trade, which he attempted and failed. all of these regulations. moratorium on drilling or keystone pipeline. he doesn t want to talk about any of them. he loses on those. his only hope in the campaign is what memo leaked in august of last year. was headlined killed romney. that is all he s got. irony is the clip you showed about him answering question about the tax return was in response to a question of how ....
Charles. one is look, you are not going to be able to fix it. nobody has over all of these decades. why try? bring troops back so no more of them die. the other side of the coin that fred elucidated. stay over there until you get it right. but the question is where is the president on that question? we heard general dempsey say the afghans are seized with the issue. fine. i know general dempsey and our troops are seized with the issue. is the president in any way seized with afghanistan in any way? do you ever hear them speaking about it? he had to bring it up today because it s becoming an epidemic. what is happening to the troops. it s not as if it happened overnight. it s been happening all year. quarter of all the diths of our deaths, nato troops is year are by friendlies. the president now speaks about it, you know, in answer to a question in a press conference. where is he on this war? he comes in office and he spends nine months dithering on it. comes up with a policy. ....