Prosecution for ordinary acts is just absurd- prosecution for ordinary acts is ust absurd. . . just absurd. but the trump argument is that actually. just absurd. but the trump argument is that actually, if just absurd. but the trump argument is that actually, if you just absurd. but the trump argument is that actually, if you don t - just absurd. but the trump argument is that actually, if you don t have - is that actually, if you don t have presidential immunity, the difficulty is you will be governing with one eye over your shoulder for some future prosecution. and it may be something that actually is some kind of vexatious prosecution that will come after and it would open the floodgates to all that. this will come after and it would open the floodgates to all that.- the floodgates to all that. as the prosecutor the floodgates to all that. as the prosecutor said the floodgates to all that. as the prosecutor said today, the floodgates to all that. as the prosecutor said today, if - the floodgates to all that. as the prosecutor said today, if a - prosecutor said today, if a president ordered a seal team to assassinate a political opponent, should be subject to a crime of murder? yes! of course he should be. they talk over each other hang on, let me put that particularly to you, scottie nell hughes, if there is an accusation of a homicide, surely anybody is not above the law, nobody is above the law? ., ,., , above the law, nobody is above the law? ., , , above the law, nobody is above the law? , ,., above the law, nobody is above the law? , ., law? nobody is above the law. scottie nell law? nobody is above the law. scottie nell hughes,
Law? nobody is above the law. scottie nell hughes, nobody. law? nobody is above the law. j scottie nell hughes, nobody is law? nobody is above the law. - scottie nell hughes, nobody is above the law? i scottie nell hughes, nobody is above the law? ., ., ., ., the law? i agree that we also have this process the law? i agree that we also have this process of the law? i agree that we also have this process of being the law? i agree that we also have this process of being convicted - the law? i agree that we also have | this process of being convicted and that is this process of being convicted and that is what is lacking in all these democrats accusations. e is yet to be convicted of any of this. but democrats accusations. e is yet to be convicted of any of this.- be convicted of any of this. but is the principal. be convicted of any of this. but is the principal, what be convicted of any of this. but is the principal, what i m be convicted of any of this. but is the principal, what i m asking - be convicted of any of this. but is the principal, what i m asking is i the principal, what i m asking is about the principle of that, not actually the individual cases. that s the thing, if he is convicted of them, that s the thing, if he is convicted of them, all that s the thing, if he is convicted of them, all of these are accusations that are very politically polarised, but i definitely wasn t going after president obama for his past killing of 3797 president obama for his past killing of 3797 people with high politically three drone strikes. let s open this pandora s three drone strikes. let s open this pandora s box and go after past presidents and the crimes they have committed. we presidents and the crimes they have committed. ~ . ., ., , committed. we are going to be talkin: committed. we are going to be talking about committed. we are going to be talking about this committed. we are going to be talking about this i m committed. we are going to be talking about this i m sure - committed. we are going to be talking about this i m sure a . committed. we are going to be l talking about this i m sure a lot, thank you very much indeed. that s all from us tonight. it s victoria tomorrow. goodbye.