AG candidate on whether Fenway Park's cashless policy is legal
Boston labor attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan says the debate over cashless transactions at Fenway Park is an important equity issue.
Stay updated with breaking news from Legality Question. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Boston labor attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan says the debate over cashless transactions at Fenway Park is an important equity issue.
Institute. we're talking about the conflicts joe biden and his family have with china. this is not just a legality question, this is an issue of national security. you have reported that the biden family accepted $31 million. do you believe this is treason given the fact that the ccp is an adversary of america? >> well, look, all i can say, maria, is i'm old enough to remember the cold war when we were combating the evil empire of the soviet union, and it's unfathomable to me that we would have tolerated at that time an american first family or second family, the vice presidency, doing busines...
Institute. we're talking about the conflicts joe biden and his family have with china. this is not just a legality question, this is an issue of national security. you have reported that the biden family accepted $31 million. do you believe this is treason given the fact that the ccp is an adversary of america? >> well, look, all i can say, maria, is i'm old enough to remember the cold war when we were combating the evil empire of the soviet union, and it's unfathomable to me that we would have tolerated at that time an american first family or second family, the vice presidency, doing busines...
Back to the question of why does the legal battle continue, and it could go on according to the aclu attorney for months now, i think it's hard for people to perhaps understand. >> yes. this battle is just going to continue until i think kim davis either resigns or loses her job, or she gets on the right page and gets with the program. >> one of the things that happened was that when we got the licenses, they were changed from prior to june 30th. they were changed and altered to remove kim davis' name. that's fine. there is still the legality
Citizen behind those following the rules legally. she's saying, no, instant citizenship -- not instant but earned citizenship over some period of time. >> big fight over this, continuing to look as though they are anti-hispanic. she's ultimately driving to put back together the obama coalition. >> do you think it's smart politics? >> i think it is for her. there's a double-edged sword here. if the republicans are smart, they will focus to some degree by the way, not just on the immigration question but legality question. she is talking about expanding a lot of these dubious constitutional move...