Page 10 - Legged Stool News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

New testimony of the alleged criminal conspiracy to help elect donald trump. Trump turned to the business at hand and asked david pecker, how is our girl . Argument for absolute immunity goes before the Supreme Court. This court never recognized criminal immunity for any public official. A private attorney who was willingly to spearhead his challenges to the election results. What was up for the party with president nixon . If everybody thought president s couldnt be prosecuted, then what was that about. If it feels completely,s because we destroyed our own democracy. Rachel maddow, Nicolle Wa...

Imal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know. For 234 years ofmecan history, no president was ever prosecuted for h oicial act. The framers of our constitution viedn energetic executive as essential to securing liberty. If a president can be charged, put on trial and in prison f his most controversial decision as soon as he leaves office, that looming threat will distort the president s decisionmaking precisely when bold and fearless action is mo nded. Every currt esident will face de facto blackmail and tortion by his political rivals while he is still i office. E implications of t...

moments of this trial. reams of evidence, weeks of testimony, and a decision that will reverberate across the world. here's what the jury will consider as they try to reach a verdict on the former president. we heard directly from stormy daniels, the adult film star who received the hush—money payment at the centre of the case. she gave salacious testimony that prosecutors use to try to show why of the 2016 election, even as he denied their sexual encounter. the prosecution also called a colourful cast of supporting witnesses to corroborate the core of their case, that donald trump...

Right from the start, mr. Chairman, the nature of this amendment and the nature of this amendment is to try to follow the advice of just about every witness who testified in this room back in september about how to stabilize the exchanges. Everybody said among the three things we should do, make clear that the costsharing reductions offsit the cost of copays, deductibles, make it clear theyre not going away for at least two years. That was one thing they said theyd do. Number two, they said put in place a Reinsurance Program for highly expensive, very expensive patient care for particular pati...

33, corporate amendment 17. I will make a clear from the start nature of this amendment is to try to follow the advice about every witness who testified in this room back in september about how to stabilize that exchanges. Everyones said we should make clear that the cost sharing reduction which would set the cost of copays and adaptable, make it clear they are going away for at least two years. Number two they said put in place a Reinsurance Program for highly expensive patient care particular patients. Number three, they said we should retain in the individual mandate if we decide not to rep...