Page 12 - Lockdown Measures News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

because they were never meant for public consumption in the aftermath, we were never meant to see them. but on a deeper level, whether there was a paper trail about some of these decisions, rishi sunak said basically that he didn't think there was a particular issue with that, it wasn't like he was trying to hide anything, but some of these conversations did take place in private. all this came up from an article that was written in the spectator magazine in the summer of last year, which was an interview that was done with rishi sunak at the time when he was a leadership contender. ...

confidence vote in technical terms so it does give some permission if you like for backbench mps to vote against the government without the consequence of losing the party whip but you're completely right to say that in reality this is of course about how much confidence the mps have in the prime minister. any rebellion on those benches would be damaging to rishi sunak, already robertjenrick wasn't resignation is damaging and this matters because the government has chosen to make this policy so symbolic, so totemic. they have set a lot of stall by this. rishi sunak was asked that if ...

position. —— r number. one of the things we discovered was children could pass the disease on to children and whilst both asymptomatic, they could then pass it on to older relatives. so, yes, that was one of the many things we had to contend with, yes. you that was one of the many things we had to contend with, yes.— had to contend with, yes. you are sa in: had to contend with, yes. you are saying you — had to contend with, yes. you are saying you received _ had to contend with, yes. you are saying you received medical- had to contend with, yes. you are | saying you received ...

consequence of that would be a firmer, more economically damaging lockdown in the future and as a trained economist, the second round impact of a decision is what economics is all about and i can get them to see, it was deeply frustrating, it was against the economic interest and as well as against the health interest to avoid the action that was necessary. the prime minister saw it as both, and he felt very keenly, the instincts on both sides. in he felt very keenly, the instincts on both sides.— he felt very keenly, the instincts on both sides. , ., ., on both sides. in your book...

there were the strong personalities within downing street and the strong personalities that went on to dominate and the toxicity within the whole decision—making process at the time. he didn't defend that, per se, but he did note some kind of defence about how the strong personalities were needed and it is not surprising they were there at the time because it is those people that i got the government to where it was in the first place. he government to where it was in the first lace. . ~ government to where it was in the first place-— government to where it was in the first lace....