Made Is News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

You have that report. mueller did all that work. they've got it there. why not use it. i do think for democrats, you know, they're going push this probably into 2020. i think for them, are they using this as a club to hit trump during his re-election campaign? at that point, that would be a danger. right now i think there's strong ground. i mean all the polling shows there's strong ground. they expand it. and that's when the clock becomes a problem for them. >> we know the chairman of the house intel committee says releasing transcripts will release them and could begin as early as next week. ...

And the point mick mulvaney made is, yeah, there are trades all the time in washington. there are trades all the time involving foreign policy. we set conditions on foreign aid. the big question is not the this for that, it's the intent. if president trump was doing this exchange, this condition for the good of the american people, for the good of the government, well, that's one thing. that's not a crime. that's not impeachable. if on the other hand he was trying to advance his campaign or personal interest, that could be another matter. so i think that's where we're going to wind up. the pre...

Talk with us later about a few of the specifics. he's up early this morning. >> sure. >> he's talk about pete butd judge. the mayor is picking up steam. he's making a very bold prediction about 2020 as well. he told show time's "the circus" that he believes the race is going to come down to between elizabeth warren and himself. >> you see it between you and warren. >> yeah. it's getting to that point where it's coming down to the two of us. there's a lot happening, but i think as that happenses, the contrasts become clear. look, the contrasts are rear. they're substantive but real. >> you say ...

>> it's unequivocal -- >> let me jump in here. andre, if this was such a perfect call and you didn't see anything wrong with it. colonel vindman testified this week -- and he's the top ukraine expert, he testified he was told by the white house lawyer john eisenberg not to discuss the president's call. then eisenberg and other national security council lawyers put it in this higher security serve. i it was such a perfect call, why was there so much energy inside the white house exerted to limit access, to keep people from talking about it, potential criminal referrals? if everything was okay, ...

Point specifically to what was -- andre, you have to pause here because i have to ask you a question. andre, andre -- >> why is -- >> i'm happy to anganswer that. >> i do the asking of questions. i then offer you the opportunity to answer them. so the question is if this was such a perfect call, why was there so much energy exerted to block access to keep people from talking about it, referrals over to doj, if everything was okay. >> e hai have no idea why. government brats do a lot of things. i can't comment on it, but, again, we're investigating something that's not nearly as quid pro quo th...