alliance among them. at one point, a fight almost broke out on the house floor, but perhaps the most telling moment came at the very end. on his way out of the capital, at around two a.m. after finally taking his oath of office as speaker, mccarthy stopped to talk to reporters to give special thanks to a special someone. i do especially think president trump. i don t think anybody should doubt his influence. he was with me from the beginning, somebody wrote that out of what he was there, and he was all in. he was all in. kevin mccarthy maybe the speaker, but this is donald trump s house. built on the backs of trump s republican acolytes whose jobs depend on the support of donald trump s own base. but dynamics that were on display during a four-day speakership battle have continued to play out in the six months since. the chaos caucus republicans, many of whom are trump loyalists and some of whom participated in the attempt to deny mccarthy the speakership, brought the cou
gotten the speakers gavel, but i think his better path forward is through do what he did all of that ceiling. find a group of democrats with whom he can work and keep striking deals with them. marginalize those folks on the fringe. as much as he can. that s the way, keep him out of the picture, and keep cutting deals with those democrats until they won t cut deals with you anymore! that was my advice to john boehner in the fall right as well, as long as you have a group out there, all it takes is five members to knock down whatever the majority wants, and there s even willing to take down procedural votes like rules, why deal with them? might not just cut a deal with hakeem jeffries, like he did one of the that ceiling, and keep doing? that was, the wait till the democrats won t do it anymore. always great to talk to you. great, wish i could talk to you for an entire hour on the stuff, but thank you for continuing to come back for us. former congressman charlie dent of pennsylvania
three-fifths. instead of it being a percent of those who show up, it will be a percent of the body, which meant and people did not understand what they were doing, that those who want to obstruct don t have to show up. and therefore, it became so easy to obstruct because the burden is all on the majority. you can go on vacation and obstruct. the vote can be 59-0 and the 59 lose and can t hold a debate. so what angus is suggesting is shouldn t the responsibility be on those who want more debate to actually be there to debate. how logical is that? very logical. let s listen to what angus king said tonight about the math of the senate now and how 41 senators in the senate could be representing a tiny population blocking what the majority wants. you can get 41 vote out of the current senate, which was enough to block any legislation,
logical. let s listen to what angus king said tonight about the math of the senate now. and how 41 senators, in the senate, could be representing a tiny population blocking what the majority wants. you can guess 41 votes out of the current senate, which was enough to block any legislation. and if you take the stakes that those 41 senators wright present, add all the population together, you get 24% of the american people. so the situation we re in now, is that 24% of the american people have been effective veto over anything that 76% of the american people think is important public policy. i don t think that squares with democratic theory. senator merkley, i no longer really understand the reluctance of democratic senators who may, i guess
Erstmals zeigt sich, wie die Bevölkerung zu kostenpflichtigen Covid-Tests steht. Bei der Ausweitung der Zertifikatspflicht sind die Meinungen ebenfalls eindeutig.