Groff v. DeJoy: What the Supreme Court's decision means for you
The court made clear that employers should accommodate employees’ religious accommodation requests unless they result in substantial increased costs.
Stay updated with breaking news from Mark Rienzi. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The court made clear that employers should accommodate employees’ religious accommodation requests unless they result in substantial increased costs.
The high court unanimously ruled in favor of a religious postman who sought to arrange his schedule so he didn’t have to work on his Sabbath.
Thursday's unanimous Supreme Court ruling telling employers they need to show a "substantial" cost to accommodate the needs of employees who require a specific day off for religious observance drew plaudits from a number of religious communities, while one group blasted the decision as advancing the goals of "Christian Nationalism" under the guise of free exercise.
The Supreme Court revived the case of a former mail carrier, an evangelical Christian, who said the United States Postal Service violated federal law by failing to reasonably accommodate his inability to work on Sundays.
The Supreme Court revived the case of a former mail carrier, an evangelical Christian, who said the United States Postal Service violated federal law by failing to reasonably accommodate his inability to work on Sundays.