SFGTV May 19, 2015
In the interpretation of law. Mr. William jz palts rely on [inaudible] of 2008. Casehe is also citing a 4th circuit case, but the Plan Department distinguish that cosbecause it is a [inaudible] and not categorical exemption. I wonder why you think in some ways the law that mr. Williams is citing is distinshuishable from the facts of this fire house im here to advice the board on the Legal Standard of review. I havent looked at the ken berryit is not a court case, it is a Regional Water Quality Control board decision that is not binding precedent for this bod and not legal precedent. It wont pr...
Source: archive.org