Page 3 - Ming Dai News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

In yet another unanimous opinion as the current term draws to a close, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled Tuesday against asylum-seeking immigrants in the companion cases of Garland v. Dai and Garland v. Alcaraz-Enriquez (previously captioned Rosen v. Dai and Rosen v. Alcaraz-Enriquez, respectively). The cases presented a procedural question that promises to have a profound impact on the cases of individuals seeking asylum in the...

Justices Appear Skeptical of Government’s Position in Cases Where Immigration Judges Are Silent Elura Nanos © Provided by Law & Crime The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments Tuesday in the companion cases of Rosen v. Dai and Rosen v. Alcaraz-Enriquez. The immigration disputes ask whether an appellate court can  presume an immigrant’s testimony is credible when lower courts were silent on the matter. When it comes to asylum petitions, an immigrant’s personal credibility is a matter of paramount importance. A person requesting asylum must file a pe...

The U.S. Supreme Court. (Courthouse News photo/Jack Rodgers) WASHINGTON (CN) — Attorneys for the U.S. government appeared to strike out Tuesday while challenging the Ninth Circuit’s practice of assuming an asylum seeker’s testimony is credible, absent a specific determination to the contrary. The Supreme Court consolidated the appeals of two immigrants, Ming Dai and Cesar Alcaraz-Enriquez, for the hearing held as a teleconference this morning because of pandemic protocols. Both applied for asylum but were turned down after their testimony left a poor impression on immigration judges. Be...

Supreme Court to Hear Cases About Police Entering Suspects’ Homes, Water Rights, and Immigration Elura Nanos © Provided by Law & Crime The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in four cases this week. Here’s what you need to know. Monday February 21, 2021. The Supreme Court on Monday will hear arguments in Florida v. Georgia, a rare case in which the high court has original jurisdiction. This means the litigation is not an appeal from a federal circuit court; rather, SCOTUS will act as trial court, because the dispute is between two states themselv...