Ming Dai News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Retirees at La Costa Glen in Carlsbad helped UCSD engineering students design products from walkers to trip sensors

Last week at Garland v Day with Garland v Alcaraz-Enriquez, The Supreme Court held that unless the agency first determines that the applicant is credible, the

On June 1, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Garland v. Ming Dai, overruling the Ninth Circuit’s longstanding “deemed-true-or-credible” rule that required reviewing courts to treat noncitizens’ testimony as credible and true absent an explicit adverse credibility determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Instead, reviewing courts must accept the BIA’s findings of fact as “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” The case involves two foreign nationals, Cesar Alcaraz-Enriquez and Ming Dai, who appealed ...

WASHINGTON  — The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside a rule used by the 9th Circuit Court in California that presumed immigrants seeking asylum were telling the truth unless an immigration judge had made an “explicit” finding that they were not credible. The justices in a 9-0 decision said this rule “cannot be reconciled” with law set by Congress that gives immigration judges the authority to weigh often conflicting accounts and to decide whether the applicant is entitled to asylum. “For many years, and over many dissents, the 9th Circuit has proceeded on the view that, “[i]n ...

In yet another unanimous opinion as the current term draws to a close, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled Tuesday against asylum-seeking immigrants in the companion cases of Garland v. Dai and Garland v. Alcaraz-Enriquez(previously captioned Rosen v. Dai and Rosen v. Alcaraz-Enriquez, respectively). The cases presented a procedural question that promises to have a profound impact on the cases of individuals seeking asylum in the United States.