Stay updated with breaking news from Most agtech. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
on word from the few reporters who were actually in the room making note, writing down, committing to memory the things we saw and experienced. things that a transcript cannot capture. take a look. >> that was something to behold. i could hear gasps all around me. i wasn't sure we were going to get to a place where we had any guilty verdict against trump, let alone all 34 counts. >> donald trump was climbing from the oval office, even todd blanche said that donald trump was writing checks from the white house. >> this is as professional a jury as you can get. and you can never read anything from them. >> just in terms of the vibes in the room, what you have heard about it being a dingy courtroom is real. >> i was in the courtroom, his eyes have been closed for most of the morning. i can't say what's happening behind those lids. >> one simple word, guilty, repeated over and over and over. something we've never seen before. >> tonight we welcome you to
exactly know what's going on. it's very difficult to get inside of somebody said right. so the chance of being vp at this point here was the betting markets and the cycles that they were chosen going back to, oh, wait on the republican side, the highest was actually pale and at 15%, paul ryan was just at 5% mike pence had just a 1% chance. so this idea that we can really get inside and understand where folks are going it's really anybody's ball game because ultimately it comes down to one person and one person alone. and that is the gop nominee, donald trump. >> that's right. and everybody has a theory about what the vp needs to do. and most of the time, it's nothing, it's really hairy. i didn't thank you. very bad issue and tonight we have a brief story for you about a senator, a wrapper, and a comedian. so here's what happened. $0.50 spent much of thursday on capitol hill talking to both republican and democratic lawmakers. while he was talking to reporters outside of the capitol, he made this comment about the upcoming election have you made a
voted — true that the people of india voted for a change.- true that the people of india voted for a change. what are the most _ voted for a change. what are the most important - voted for a change. what are the most important issues i voted for a change. what are l the most important issues that you think need to be addressed right now? i you think need to be addressed right now?— right now? i would say the wound created _ right now? i would say the wound created by - right now? i would say the wound created by the - right now? i would say the l wound created by the prime minister himself in the election rallies and all against the minority communities. in the whole election rallies and the bjp�*s ideology is also embedded in this polarisation. it must be healed, these kind of wounds, because for the future impact of the country, the coexistence and the relationship between its by india should remain. these results have proved that people — these results have proved that people in— these results have proved that people in the _ these results have proved that people in the process, - these results have proved thatl people in the process, speaking from _ people in the process, speaking from a — people in the process, speaking from a perspective _ people in the process, speaking from a perspective of— people in the process, speaking from a perspective of minority. from a perspective of minority citizen. — from a perspective of minority citizen. the _ from a perspective of minority citizen, the kind _ from a perspective of minority citizen, the kind of— from a perspective of minorityl citizen, the kind of atmosphere before — citizen, the kind of atmosphere before the _ citizen, the kind of atmosphere before the elections, _ before the elections, especially— before the elections, especially after- before the elections, i especially after 2019,, before the elections, - especially after 2019,, focused on the — especially after 2019,, focused on the four— especially after 2019,, focused on the four lanes _ especially after 2019,, focused on the four lanes which - especially after 2019,, focused on the four lanes which would i on the four lanes which would not he — on the four lanes which would not be focused _ on the four lanes which would not be focused in _ on the four lanes which would not be focused in that - on the four lanes which would not be focused in that sense. | on the four lanes which would | not be focused in that sense. i not be focused in that sense. don't see any kind of division
pretty much booked up you have seen this court schedule you've got four key categories still outstanding how long how long do you think you've got a motion to dismiss based on jack smith's you've got a gag order as a category, but classified information procedures act concerns sepah and then of course, a motion to dismiss based on attorney-client privilege as just a couple of the buckets here. >> judge, how long should these typically take to sort out? most, first of all, the sepah stuff, we should have been resolved along time ago and that was called off by the initial actions to enjoin the fbi from looking at these documents that went up to the 11th circuit twice before they finally told her, let it go. you can't do this and so as a result of which this should have been over with the motions to strike or to dismiss because of jack smith's appointment, both of them are really based
retribution decipher and i just just as real and dangerous mother jones trump's obsession with revenge a big poster verdict danger daily beast revenge what trump and the gop want most of all the brain trust morning joe donald trump and his alleys are looking to do this he's just hillary clinton be jailed in response and he says he will serve it up and so with that i'm not sure what more people need to know given a lot of things donald trump as promised have come to pass. >> great work there still sorry to break the news but hillary is roaming the streets and sweat
and his wife, ginni, the investigative news outlet propublica reported last year that thomas and his wife accepted luxury trips and gifts from crow for decades. most of which went unreported on thomas's financial disclosures thomas is reporting of that bali trip was among several new financial disclosures by the justices published today among them for tickets to a beyond say, concert hurt last year that the pop star gave to liberal justice ketanji brown jackson. the gift was not illegal or unethical under the court's rules, justices are required to report gifts over a certain amount about $400. they have to report them. and in this case, he's tickets were worth more than about $4,000. so that's why they were reported. >> a supreme court spokeswoman referencing an early hit song by beyond say, since cnn, a statement saying court justice jackson is crazy in love with bianna. music, who isn't jackson also reported that she received artwork valued at more than 12,000 thousand dollars from artists lonnie holley and dr. kathy earls ross, the
what we're observing about tone, how things are going. i often focus on the jury, because i'm interested in what they're picking up on. right away the jury's looking at each other like stuff's about to go down here. >> really? >> it had been a sleepy morning. everybody was sort of feeling monday in all of its glory, and then bob costello gets on the stand in the afternoon and we're off to the races. because he was so, i think, contemn wous of the judge, this is a former federal prosecutor who really felt like he should be respected. and he thought susan, the prosecutor, was challenging him in a way he didn't like. and he didn't like being interrupted when she was objecting, and most of those objections were sustained. and so in the room, the tension is boiling, okay? and it finally, the judge sends the jury out. and i thought, oh god, here we go. but then, robert costello is giving it back to the judge. and the judge got so upset he clears the courtroom from the press, which is highly unusual, okay? usually, if there's a security situation, that's one thing.
justices new disclosures of book deals are also raising some eyebrows. jackson, a liberal justice who's the first african american woman on the court, received a payment from a publisher last year for almost $900,000. conservative justice neil gorsuch reported book royalty income of $250,000. fellow conservative brett kavanaugh, who is writing a memoir, listed a payment for $340,000 justices are allowed to have some outside income, but most of their outside income is kept around $30,000 thanks except you do not have to have a limit on book royalties and fees. >> so these justices who signed these multimillion dollar their contracts are not subject to any cap and they can make as much as they can from these book deals. >> but critics say all of this as well as the recent reporting that conservative justice samuel alito and his wife flew flags at their homes that were also flown by january 6, rioters doesn't present the best optics for the court alito had previously drawn criticism
better at preserving democracy, but 43% think trump will be better. >> quentin, you see there only a seven point difference. and that is with someone who tried to overturn the last election, how do you combat that? >> week about it by continuing to put in the work i'm american voters rejected donald trump because they seem the type of leader that he's going to be they seen him giveaway trade secrets. they've seen him put our men and women in uniform in danger during his entire presidency, americans remember what it was like to wake up and wonder if donald trump was going to start a war, war for because he was tweeting he is unhinged. and again, he has no business being anywhere near the white house since our campaign is going to continue to double down continued to make sure that the president and the vice president are surrogates are getting front of americans where they are talking to them about the issues that matter. most. and most importantly, again, that go into presidents remarks that democracy requires something from all of us and it's the
qualified prosecutors that he will probably vary himself and may well just fell always more doubt. i'm not saying that just about hunter biden most defendants end up doing that. so that's gonna be one tough decision. of course, hunter biden will make it in the final analysis, but it is full of risks. if he gets before that jury so we're now a weekend of this. how do you think the jury is leaning after what you have seen that they've seen the state, the government has put on an extraordinarily strong case. most of it, of course, came from forensics write it came from the laptop more than anything else. the text messages but everything we know that convictions occur in the past 1015 years because of digital evidence, more than almost any other evidence as well. yes, they need drug tests. yes, they need an fbi agent, but that laptop and everything that came from it and all other digital evidence is so strong in this case that