Not Contempt News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Meadows richly deserves. there used to be a stiff come ever competition for the worst chief of staff in history. no longer. meadows owns that title by a country mile and it's almost as if not contempt with worst chief but wants dumbest chief. he's relying on this argument of privilege, which has to yield to evidence of a criminal conspiracy and attempt to over throw the government as liz cheney pointed out. number two, he is by the way has delivered thousands of pages of documents and emails to the committee while claiming the same privilege -- >> and written a book. >> and by the way just rel...

Is not wise to do these things. you're going to destabilize the world. he's going to be going and facing a group of europeans when he gets to europe in the next 24 or 36 hours that's very, very skeptical. i was surprised he was going to bring a commitment to nato from president-elect trump. we haven't heard that from mr. trump. he tles end nato, as you know, but i thought that was reassuring. i thought underneath all of that was a deep concern, if not contempt, of the things he didn't kpm pm. >> you have to remember, too, you recommended to president-elect trump that he extend an olive branch ...

Undermine representative democracy. you got a vast majority of americans who support the modest proposal in the gun bills. the controversial stuff like an assault weapons ban has been removed. why not have a vote? if the vast majority of americans, we're not talking narrow 54-46, but 80%, 90% say universal background checks a good idea. why not have debate? an attempt to block that shows a certain degree of contempt to the vast majority of americans. >> not contempt for those who live in states that have those who don't want gun control. >> if they think what they are representing is a better ...

There. >> dana: let me defend the supreme court as a body. one thing we argue on the contraception issue if it were to go to supreme court it would lose based on the precedent of the supreme court own making because three months ago, in a vote of 9-0, they pushed back on the administration. i might not agree with her on every issue but it's not contempt. it's just different interpretation. that's why this is important. if you look at the makeup of the court and age of the justices, the president in the next four to eight year will have impact on the supreme court. the nominees will be younger ...