Stay updated with breaking news from Privacy cases. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
that s a wouldn t be worth investigating. fific that s a decision for the police and the police have carried out investigations into mirror group newspapers and this had led to a small number of convictions. interestingly, some of the journalist convicted for doing unlawful activities whilst working for these newspapers have come to this core and given evidence that the other side, for those people who are claiming against those newspapers, they have become effectively whistle blowers. that has triggered a bit of an industry in this whole area of law, privacy cases where privacy cases are used to attack newspapers for unlawful practices in the past and then tried to seek damages from those. now, philippa, i m going to say thank you very much forjoining us and let you get out of the cold. we will have someone else to talk to on a second. just yourfinal comment someone else to talk to on a second. just your final comment on the importance of today s ruling. i importance ....
our friend martha is back today. martha: good morning. it is a deadly epidemic. we have covered it extensively. it reaches all states, all walks of life, all kinds of families. the powerful opioid known as fentanyl is an indiscriminate killer took the lives of all these people whose faces you see on the screen right now and teens at a record pace. in 2021 fentanyl was identified in 77% of as lessent drug deaths. cartels have an enormous business. they will stop at nothing turning the drug into a weapons of mass destruction. lindsey graham says it is time to fight back. here is what i would say. america is under attack of the our nation is being attacked by foreign powers called drug cartels in mexico. this is the largest attack on american s homeland by a foreign power in the history of the nation. 70,000 americans were poisoned by fentanyl last year. we need to take the gloves off. they are at war with us. we need to be at war with them. bill: we go to texas, sch ....
out new york state s restrictive regulations on concealed carry pistol permits. thomas wrote the majority opinion. shannon bream, chief legal correspondent is in focus now. shannon, first of all the reverberation that can happen throughout the state of new york. is it immediate? pretty much. it will be hard for them to enforce this specific law anymore. what this doesn t mean so people know is you can simply go out in new york and buy a gun and start carrying it everywhere you want and no questions asked. this was about the concealed carry permit situation. my suspicion is that s fully going to remain in place. the way you get that permit is going to change based ton supreme court decision. what it required was a specialized showing or heightened need that you would have for concealed carry permit. the plaintiffs here one of them a firearms instructor said listen, i don t think i should have to have a special reason to conceal carry if i m a law abiding citizen. cel ....
Harry and other celebrities sue the daily mail for stealing personal information and a shot at the royal family saying they kept him in the dark on allegations of phone hacking. that case continues. we have the coronation coming up soon. martha: he showed up for the testimony in one of these privacy cases. he was with elton john back in the u.k. seemed to be glad people were taking pictures of him showing up there. so it s a little selective one might say. bill: one might indeed. all right. stay tuned for more on that. in the meantime we have this. martha: the subject of a popular true crime podcast has his murder conviction reinstated. what it means for his freedom and future. plus the man suing actress againeth paltrow takes the stand with new allegations against her ....
Topic of guns come out as an opinion with the u.s. supreme court. talk about the historic nature, the significance of what we re seeing today? this is a momentous decision for gun rights advocates. it reminds me a bit of the capps decision on privacy where the court restructured how we approach privacy cases. that s what thomas is doing here. he is getting rid of what was called a two-step analysis that was used by lower courts and drew a very clear line that like other individuals rights in the bill of rights the presumption is in favor of the citizen. they don t have to show this type of burden that they really need to use an individual right in this case to carry a concealed weapon. i think this is going to be one of the most important decisions that justice thomas has handed ....