Page 6 - Privilege Assertions News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Obviously, mr. meadows did not comply with his obligation to come in. you can't just say i'm not coming in. you have a privilege. you have to assert it, question by question and then we can make a determination. on the other hand, he was the chief of staff, so the privilege assertions are more complicated than mr. bannon, who was not even a federal employee. so, we are hopeful that the doj will proceed. meanwhile, we are getting information about mr. meadows activity from other sources in a position to know. >> alex jones went public monday with the fact that he testified under oath to the com...

Chief of staff, so the privilege assertions are more complicated than mr. bannon, who was not even a federal employee. so, we are hopeful that the doj will proceed. meanwhile, we are getting information about mr. meadows activity from other sources in a position to know. >> alex jones went public monday with the fact that he testified under oath to the committee on monday on his show, he talked about it. and he said that he took the fifth amendment about 100 times. and he said that he knew what the answers were for about half of those questions. you can't just throw the fifth amendment around....

Would you like to see the notes his lawyer took on their criminal fuckin' conspiracy?

Cooperate on those matters. that alone is sufficient to advance the referral. but for the sake of argument, let's talk about mr. meadows' privilege assertions. the select committee is not able to assess whether mr. meadows is making those assertions in good faith because he won't even come in and address them on a question by question basis as required. i have my view of whether he made these claims in good faith because i've seen him on television talking about his conversations with the president and promoting his book. i understand that this is a difficult matter. i have no great desire to ...

0 defense. the court yesterday appointed a guardian to represent their son. they have seemingly abandoned him. have had no contact with him. have not seen him or spoken to him. obviously what lies ahead for their case, it's going to be a difficult one for prosecutors after they charge them with four counts of involuntary manslaughter arguing that they gave him the gun as a gift, but also saying that they did nothing to prevent him from unleashing this shooting, this attack. prosecutors saying they knew things were going on and they should have done stuff, that's why they charged them and we'll...