Page 7 - Process Arguments News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Doesn't want to be impeached, viewing it as a personal humiliation. >> that will be the first line of any biography that comes from this point on, that he was the third president to be impeached in the history of the country. although he has lined up the support of republicans from the top down in the senate and his conviction is very unlikely, this is still a defeat. we've seen from the beginning, this is a president who does not like to lose and he sees even the vote that's going to be taken in the house this week, he will see that as a defeat, he will see that as a personal slight. but at t...

Conduct. why was it not a fulsome debate? >> i don't think they have -- i don't think they felt comfortable engaging on the facts, but i do think these process arguments have been working the a certain extent with the public. that's the reason you're not seeing pressure on republicans to vote to convict the president and why i think if there is a glimmer of bipartisanship in this process, it's going to be house democrats in vulnerable districts voting to impeach the president. >> michael steel, adrienne elrod and elise jordan, thank you. here is jamie rascon of the house judiciary committee. h...

Instead focus again on farcical process arguments in my view. i'm compelled to respond to at least one of those which is this notion about the closed door depositions. because as i understand it from reading these transcripts, many minority members were present and granted equal time to question witnesses brought before the intelligence committee, the foreign affairs committee and the government oversight committee. some of those members are actually on this committee. so i struggle to understand the objections in that regard. the idea that the intelligence committee's investigation was not su...

The live testimony of ambassador sondland, lieutenant colonel vindman and so many other public servants over the course of many weeks as millions of americans watched along with us. so again, it is -- i understand that we're going to have a robust debate about the legal standards that govern the inquiry before us and the decision we make on these articles but let us stay true to the facts and let's dispense with these process arguments and get to the substance of why we are here today. i'll also just say, historical context matters. i was not on the judiciary committee in 1999, 1998, but my un...

The live testimony of ambassador sondland, vindman and so many other public servants over the course of many weeks as millions of americans watched along with us. so again, it is -- i understand that we are going to have a robust debate about the legal standards that govern the inquiry that is before us and the decision we make on these articles. let us stay true to the facts and let's dispense with these process arguments and get to the substance of why we are here today. i will also just say historical context matters. i was not on the judiciary committee in 1999 and 1998 but my understandin...