Page 7 - Protocol Department News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Protocol department. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Protocol Department Today - Breaking & Trending Today

SFGTV August 19, 2014

As possible so on outside lobbyist you make one contact with a city official you have to automatically registration as a lobbyist then the issue thats known as obligates that is directed towards the public saying hey please contact our Public Officials to do xyz. That gets to the expertise lobbyist that was addressed its true we dont have a regime for that right now. So whether its thats called for or not if the grand jury thinks to some stent it is that makes sense any other comments from the commissioners on finding recommendation 10 . Finding and recommendation 11 . I also want some clarification on 11. I dont know if the City Attorney actually should talk about the upcoming case id like to know why we think its maybe you want to change that sewer Deputy Director arnold i believe what the staff is proposing in terms ....

United States , San Francisco , Public Officials , City Attorney , Deputy Director , Court Case , Court Case Involving , City Bay , California Supreme Court , Supreme Court , Electronic Communications , Communications Email , Communication System , District Attorneys Office , Attorneys Office , Communication Technologies , Employee Commission , Part Commission , Commission Civil , Responses Commission , Vice President , Department Responses , Protocol Department , Commission Holds , Ordinance Section , Public Entity ,

SFGTV August 19, 2014

Attorneys office is advised they shouldnt make the argument but it the definitely a gray area and an ear where the law is developing thats all when a the commissioner is trying to get at. Things will become clarified especially with the new Communication Technologies has it been auditor yet. No, i dont believe so. This is another one where i would like to revisit it once you know so if you could keep us advised when it is argued and decided. Any other questions or comments for the commissioners on 11 i wanted to check in the commissioners and staff and perhaps the public as well were now almost anothers 1 oclock. Were not halfway through i believe the recommendations. We have 29. Do we want to take a lunch break. Yes. He let me address this to the chair i understand i think we have this room until 3 or something. I made a contempt for another legal matter that requires me to be at a 3 oclock so ill asked to be excluded ....

United States , San Francisco , Communication Technologies , Employee Commission , Part Commission , Commission Civil , Responses Commission , Vice President , Department Responses , Protocol Department , Commission Holds , Ordinance Section , City Attorney , Public Entity , Response Department , Response Department Head , Department Head , Head Commission , Anyone Office , Office Experience , Going Forward , Recommendation Commission , Like Commission , Commission Wants , Public Comment , Francisco Open ,

SFGTV August 24, 2014

Reason trigger the law as a result their compensations is captured the lobbyist have changed there was a deliberate attempt to cast the net has wide as possible so on outside lobbyist you make one contact with a city official you have to automatically registration as a lobbyist then the issue thats known as obligates that is directed towards the public saying hey please contact our Public Officials to do xyz. That gets to the expertise lobbyist that was addressed its true we dont have a regime for that right now. So whether its thats called for or not if the grand jury thinks to some stent it is that makes sense any other comments from the commissioners on finding recommendation 10 . Finding and recommendation 11 . I also want some clarification on 11. I dont know if the City Attorney actually should talk about the upcoming case id like to know why we think its maybe you wan ....

United States , San Francisco , Public Officials , City Attorney , Deputy Director , Court Case , Court Case Involving , City Bay , California Supreme Court , Supreme Court , Electronic Communications , Communications Email , Communication System , District Attorneys Office , Attorneys Office , Communication Technologies , Employee Commission , Part Commission , Commission Civil , Responses Commission , Vice President , Department Responses , Protocol Department , Commission Holds , Ordinance Section , Public Entity ,

SFGTV August 26, 2014

On what the California Supreme Court decided this could affect other Electronic Communications that isnt about email but to the take the opportunity extending stent an official can use private emails and text and otherwise and claim because its not on the public Communication System s it is automatically not subject to the private act so that question which the District Attorneys Office is advised they shouldnt make the argument but it the definitely a gray area and an ear where the law is developing thats all when a the commissioner is trying to get at. Things will become clarified especially with the new Communication Technologies has it been auditor yet. No, ....

United States , San Francisco , California Supreme Court , Supreme Court , Electronic Communications , Communications Email , Communication System , District Attorneys Office , Attorneys Office , Communication Technologies , Employee Commission , Part Commission , Commission Civil , Responses Commission , Vice President , Department Responses , Protocol Department , Commission Holds , Ordinance Section , City Attorney , Public Entity , Response Department , Response Department Head , Department Head , Head Commission , Anyone Office ,

SFGTV September 9, 2014

Referred to recommendation 11. Okay. And so we think its depending on what the California Supreme Court decided this could affect other Electronic Communications that isnt about email but to the take the opportunity extending stent an official can use private emails and text and otherwise and claim because its not on the public Communication System s it is automatically not subject to the private act so that question which the District Attorneys Office is advised they shouldnt make the argument but it the definitely a gray area and an ear where the law is developing thats all when a the commissioner is trying to get at. Things will become clarified especially with the new
United States , San Francisco , California Supreme Court , Supreme Court , Electronic Communications , Communications Email , Communication System , District Attorneys Office , Attorneys Office , Communication Technologies , Employee Commission , Part Commission , Commission Civil , Responses Commission , Vice President , Department Responses , Protocol Department , Commission Holds , Ordinance Section , City Attorney , Public Entity , Response Department , Response Department Head , Department Head , Head Commission , Anyone Office ,