Page 7 - Question Basis News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Notion that he would not be a radical judge, and that he would respect 50 years of precedent. and of course, he did not. >> i mean it is such a reversal that not only did he say he was going to respect precedent but in his opinion overturning roe, you talked about how precedent was not good enough for this, that this was a wrong that should overrule any sympathies toward precedent? >> egregiously long. if he knew that, and he has felt that all along, if you go back to that memo from 1985, then you have to ask yourself, what is it that tells him to do so. >> take a drink of water. i'll ask anot...

Clear majorities would vote for supreme court justices, no matter if they were introduced or nominated by an opposing president. >> yes, and but i don't think there was anything, at least there is no notation in the diary by ted kennedy that i really don't like this guy, but he was, he was wary, he had been around politics for a long time, and he knew that the republicans, he knew george w. bush, he worked with w. on education and other things, and he did sense the landscape. key see where things were going. i don't know whether senator colins could not, or whether she was also playing a littl...

The entire subpoena and he said he has a privilege and he shouldn't have to testify and the judge may denied that and said no, there are hundreds of questions that the prosecutors could ask that have nothing to do with your potential speech and debate clause protections. lindsey graham appealed it to the 11th circuit and they kicked it back to judge may and said, judge may, try to figure out on a question by question basis what lindsey graham might have speech and debate protection to and what questions he wouldn't have that protection to. and that is really curious because that is not how any...

Gonna be asked, and then, on a question by question basis, you assert any relevant privilege you think may apply. you can't just say, i cannot be asked anything! after. ever. also, the time period in question here they wanted to ask him about this 2020 and 2021. in 2020 and when he's on one, steve bannon was a broadcaster, not a presidential advisor, he was a broadcaster, and nothing against podcasters. some of them are our best friends, right? but did not work in the white house or for the government in any capacity and head not four years, by the time he did this stuff that the investigators...

He denounced it. he put on a little red face and yelled about tv cameras. and i'm sure he enjoyed that, but it's not, that's not a legal response. a subpoena is a binding thing. you have to respond to it. he claimed the reason that he was defying the subpoena was executive privilege. that president trump had a right to his counsel, as a government employee, and he couldn't violate the private sanctity of his advisors an official adviser to the president. legally speaking, that is a pile of corn knots. i mean, first of all, if you want to assert that you can't answer questions because of some a...